bool DynamicIDHandler::LookupUnqualified(LookupResult& R, Scope* S) {
if (!IsDynamicLookup(R, S))
return false;
if (Callbacks && Callbacks->isEnabled()) {
return Callbacks->LookupObject(R, S);
}
DeclarationName Name = R.getLookupName();
IdentifierInfo* II = Name.getAsIdentifierInfo();
SourceLocation Loc = R.getNameLoc();
VarDecl* Result = VarDecl::Create(m_Context,
R.getSema().getFunctionLevelDeclContext(),
Loc,
Loc,
II,
m_Context.DependentTy,
/*TypeSourceInfo*/0,
SC_None,
SC_None);
if (Result) {
R.addDecl(Result);
// Say that we can handle the situation. Clang should try to recover
return true;
}
// We cannot handle the situation. Give up
return false;
}
bool SymbolResolverCallback::LookupObject(LookupResult& R, Scope* S) {
if (!ShouldResolveAtRuntime(R, S))
return false;
if (m_IsRuntime) {
// We are currently parsing an EvaluateT() expression
if (!m_Resolve)
return false;
// Only for demo resolve all unknown objects to cling::test::Tester
if (!m_TesterDecl) {
clang::Sema& SemaR = m_Interpreter->getSema();
clang::NamespaceDecl* NSD = utils::Lookup::Namespace(&SemaR, "cling");
NSD = utils::Lookup::Namespace(&SemaR, "test", NSD);
m_TesterDecl = utils::Lookup::Named(&SemaR, "Tester", NSD);
}
assert (m_TesterDecl && "Tester not found!");
R.addDecl(m_TesterDecl);
return true; // Tell clang to continue.
}
// We are currently NOT parsing an EvaluateT() expression.
// Escape the expression into an EvaluateT() expression.
ASTContext& C = R.getSema().getASTContext();
DeclContext* DC = 0;
// For DeclContext-less scopes like if (dyn_expr) {}
while (!DC) {
DC = static_cast<DeclContext*>(S->getEntity());
S = S->getParent();
}
DeclarationName Name = R.getLookupName();
IdentifierInfo* II = Name.getAsIdentifierInfo();
SourceLocation Loc = R.getNameLoc();
VarDecl* Res = VarDecl::Create(C, DC, Loc, Loc, II, C.DependentTy,
/*TypeSourceInfo*/0, SC_None);
// Annotate the decl to give a hint in cling. FIXME: Current implementation
// is a gross hack, because TClingCallbacks shouldn't know about
// EvaluateTSynthesizer at all!
SourceRange invalidRange;
Res->addAttr(new (C) AnnotateAttr(invalidRange, C, "__ResolveAtRuntime", 0));
R.addDecl(Res);
DC->addDecl(Res);
// Say that we can handle the situation. Clang should try to recover
return true;
}
bool SymbolResolverCallback::ShouldResolveAtRuntime(LookupResult& R,
Scope* S) {
if (R.getLookupKind() != Sema::LookupOrdinaryName)
return false;
if (R.isForRedeclaration())
return false;
if (!R.empty())
return false;
// FIXME: Figure out better way to handle:
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
// In a class member access expression (5.2.5), if the . or -> token is
// immediately followed by an identifier followed by a <, the
// identifier must be looked up to determine whether the < is the
// beginning of a template argument list (14.2) or a less-than operator.
// The identifier is first looked up in the class of the object
// expression. If the identifier is not found, it is then looked up in
// the context of the entire postfix-expression and shall name a class
// or function template.
//
// We want to ignore object(.|->)member<template>
if (R.getSema().PP.LookAhead(0).getKind() == tok::less)
// TODO: check for . or -> in the cached token stream
return false;
for (Scope* DepScope = S; DepScope; DepScope = DepScope->getParent()) {
if (DeclContext* Ctx = static_cast<DeclContext*>(DepScope->getEntity())) {
if (!Ctx->isDependentContext())
// For now we support only the prompt.
if (isa<FunctionDecl>(Ctx))
return true;
}
}
return false;
}