Ravi is a derivative/dialect of Lua 5.3 with limited optional static typing and an LLVM based JIT compiler. The name Ravi comes from the Sanskrit word for the Sun.

Lua is perfect as a small embeddable dynamic language so why a derivative? Ravi extends Lua with static typing for greater performance under JIT compilation. However, the static typing is optional and therefore Lua programs are also valid Ravi programs.

There are other attempts to add static typing to Lua (e.g. Typed Lua but these efforts are mostly about adding static type checks in the language while leaving the VM unmodified. So the static typing is to aid programming in the large - the code is eventually translated to standard Lua and executed in the unmodified Lua VM.

My motivation is somewhat different - I want to enhance the VM to support more efficient operations when types are known. Type information can be exploited by JIT compilation technology to improve performance.

• Optional static typing for Lua
• Type specific bytecodes to improve performance
• Compatibility with Lua 5.3 (see Compatibility section below)
• LLVM based JIT compiler
• Additionally a libgccjit based alternative JIT compiler is also available.

See Ravi Documentation. As more stuff is built I will keep updating the documentation so please revisit for latest information.

The project was kicked off in January 2015.

The LLVM JIT compiler is mostly functional. The Lua and Ravi bytecodes currently implemented in LLVM are described in JIT Status page.

Ravi also provides an LLVM binding; this is still work in progress so please check documentation for the latest status.

As of July 2015 the libgccjit based JIT implementation is also functional but some byte codes are not yet compiled.

For performance benchmarks please visit the Ravi Performance Benchmarks page.

Ravi allows you to annotate local variables and function parameters with static types. The supported types and the resulting behaviour are as follows:

integer

denotes an integral value of 64-bits.

number

denotes a double (floating point) value of 8 bytes.

integer[]

denotes an array of integers

number[]

denotes an array of numbers

Declaring the types of local variables and function parameters has following advantages.

• Local variables declared with above types are automatically initialized to 0
• Arithmetic operations trigger type specific bytecodes which leads to more efficient JIT compilation
• Specialised operators to get/set from arrays are implemented which makes array access more efficient in JIT mode as the access can be inlined
• Values assigned to typed variables are checked statically unless the values are results from a function call in which case the there is an attempt to convert values at runtime (i.e. value is cast to the expected type)
• The standard table operations on arrays are checked to ensure that the type is not subverted
• Even if a typed variable is captured in a closure its type must be respected
• When function parameters are decorated with types, Ravi performs an implicit coersion of those parameters to the required types. If the coersion fails a runtime error occurs.

The array types are specializations of Lua table with some additional special behaviour:

• Indices >= 1 should be used (note that Ravi arrays (and slices) have a hidden slot at index 0 for performance reasons, but this is not visible under pairs() or ipairs(), or when initializing an array using a literal initializer; only direct access via the [] operator can see this slot)
• Array elements are set to 0 not nil as default value
• An array will grow automatically if user sets the element just past the array length
• It is an error to attempt to set an element that is beyond len+1
• The current used length of the array is recorded and returned by len operations
• The array only permits the right type of value to be assigned (this is also checked at runtime to allow compatibility with Lua)
• Accessing out of bounds elements will cause an error, except for setting the len+1 element
• It is possible to pass arrays to functions and return arrays from functions. Arrays passed to functions appear as Lua tables inside those functions if the parameters are untyped - however the tables will still be subject to restrictions as above. If the parameters are typed then the arrays will be recognized at compile time.
• Arrays returned from functions can be stored into appropriately typed local variables - there is validation that the types match.
• Operations on array types can be optimised to special bytecode and JIT only when the array type is statically known. Otherwise regular table access will be used subject to runtime checks.
• Array types may not have meta methods - this will be enforced at runtime (TODO)
• pairs() and ipairs() work on arrays as normal
• There is no way to delete an array element.

Since release 0.6 Ravi supports array slices. An array slice allows a portion of a Ravi array to be treated as if it is an array - this allows efficient access to the underlying array elements. Following new functions are available:

table.intarray(num_elements, initial_value)

creates an integer array of specified size, and initializes with initial value. The return type is integer[]

table.numarray(num_elements, initial_value)

creates an number array of specified size, and initializes with initial value. The return type is number[]

table.slice(array, start_index, num_elements)

creates a slice from an existing array - allowing efficient access to the underlying array elements.

The functions are currently part of the table module but this may change in future. For an example use of these functions please see the matmul1.ravi benchmark program in the repository. Note that this feature is highly experimental and not very well tested.

Array slices do not support automatic extension - i.e. the size of the slice cannot be changed once it is created.

Example of code that works - you can copy this to the command line input:

function tryme()
  local i,j = 5,6
  return i,j
end
local i:integer, j:integer = tryme(); print(i+j)

When values from a function call are assigned to a typed variable, an implicit type coersion takes place. In above example an error would occur if the function returned values that could not converted to integers.

In the following example, the parameter j is defined as a number, hence it is an error to pass a value that cannot be converted to a number:

function tryme(j: number)
  for i=1,1000000000 do
    j = j+1
  end
  return j
end
print(tryme(0.0))

An example with arrays:

function tryme()
  local a : number[], j:number = {}
  for i=1,10 do
    a[i] = i
    j = j + a[i]
  end
  return j
end
print(tryme())

Another example using arrays. Here the function receives a parameter arr of type number[] - it would be an error to pass any other type to the function because only number[] types can be converted to number[] types:

function sum(arr: number[]) 
  local n: number = 0.0
  for i = 1,#arr do
    n = n + arr[i]
  end
  return n
end

print(sum(table.numarray(10, 2.0)))

The table.numarray(n, initial_value) creates a number[] of specified size and initializes the array with the given initial value.

To keep with Lua's dynamic nature Ravi uses a mix of compile type checking and runtime type checks. However due to the dynamic nature of Lua, compilation happens at runtime anyway so effectually all checks are at runtime.

The LLVM based JIT compiler is functional. Most bytecodes other than bit-wise operators are JIT compiled when using LLVM, but there are restrictions as described in compatibility section below. Everything described below relates to using LLVM as the JIT compiler.

There are two modes of JIT compilation.

auto mode

in this mode the compiler decides when to compile a Lua function. The current implementation is very simple - any Lua function call is checked to see if the bytecodes contained in it can be compiled. If this is true then the function is compiled provided either a) function has a fornum loop, or b) it is largish (greater than 150 bytecodes) or c) it is being executed many times (> 50). Because of the simplistic behaviour performance the benefit of JIT compilation is only available if the JIT compiled functions will be executed many times so that the cost of JIT compilation can be amortized.

manual mode

in this mode user must explicitly request compilation. This is the default mode. This mode is suitable for library developers who can pre compile the functions in library module table.

A JIT api is available with following functions:

ravi.jit([b])

returns enabled setting of JIT compiler; also enables/disables the JIT compiler; defaults to true

ravi.auto([b [, min_size [, min_executions]]])

returns setting of auto compilation and compilation thresholds; also sets the new settings if values are supplied; defaults are false, 150, 50.

ravi.compile(func[, options])

compiles a Lua function if possible, returns true if compilation was successful. options is an optional table with compilation options - in particular omitArrayGetRangeCheck - which disables range checks in array get operations to improve performance in some cases.

ravi.iscompiled(func)

returns the JIT status of a function

ravi.dumplua(func)

dumps the Lua bytecode of the function

ravi.dumpir(func)

dumps the IR of the compiled function (only if function was compiled; only LLVM version)

ravi.dumpasm(func)

dumps the machine code using the currently set optimization level (only if function was compiled; only LLVM)

ravi.optlevel([n])

sets LLVM optimization level (0, 1, 2, 3); defaults to 2

ravi.sizelevel([n])

sets LLVM size level (0, 1, 2); defaults to 0

Ravi should be able to run all Lua 5.3 programs in interpreted mode. When JIT compilation is enabled some things will not work:

• You cannot yield from a compiled function as compiled code does not support coroutines (issue 14); as a workaround Ravi will only execute JITed code from the main Lua thread; any secondary threads (coroutines) execute in interpreter mode.
• The debugger will not provide certain information when JIT compilation is turned on as information it requires is not available; the debugger also does not support Ravi's extended opcodes (issue 15)
• Functions using bit-wise operations may not be JIT compiled always (issue 27)
• Ravi supports optional typing and enhanced types such as arrays (described above). Programs using these features cannot be run by standard Lua. However all types in Ravi can be passed to Lua functions - there are some restrictions on arrays as described above. Values crossing from Lua to Ravi will be subjected to typechecks.
• In JITed code tailcalls are implemented as regular calls so unlike Lua VM which supports infinite tail recursion JIT compiled code only supports tail recursion to a depth of about 110 (issue 17)
• pairs() and ipairs() work on Ravi arrays since release 0.4 but more testing needed (issues 24 and 25)
• Upvalues cannot subvert the static typing of local variables since release 0.4 but more testing is needed (issue 26)
• Lua C API may not work correctly for Ravi arrays, although some initial work has been done in this area (issue 9)
• Certain Lua limits are reduced due to changed byte code structure. These are described below.

• CMake
• LLVM 3.6 or 3.7

The build is CMake based.

I built LLVM 3.7.0 from source. I used the following sequence from the VS2015 command window:

cd \github\llvm
mkdir build
cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=c:\LLVM37 -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" -G "Visual Studio 14 Win64" ..  

I then opened the generated solution in VS2015 and performed a INSTALL build from there. Note that if you perform a Release build of LLVM then you will also need to do a Release build of Ravi otherwise you will get link errors.

On Ubuntu I found that the official LLVM distributions don't work with CMake. The CMake config files appear to be broken. So I ended up downloading and building LLVM 3.7.0 from source and that worked. The approach is similar to that described for MAC OS X below.

I am using Max OSX Yosemite. Pre-requisites are XCode 6.1 and CMake. Ensure cmake is on the path. Assuming that LLVM source has been extracted to $HOME/llvm-3.7.0.src I follow these steps:

cd llvm-3.7.0.src
mkdir build
cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/LLVM -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" ..
make install

I am developing Ravi using Visual Studio 2015 Community Edition on Windows 8.1 64bit, gcc on Unbuntu 64-bit, and clang/Xcode on MAC OS X.

Assuming that LLVM has been installed as described above, then on Windows I invoke the cmake config as follows:

cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=c:\ravi -DLLVM_DIR=c:\LLVM37\share\llvm\cmake -G "Visual Studio 14 Win64" ..

I then open the solution in VS2015 and do a build from there.

On Ubuntu I use:

cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/ravi -DLLVM_DIR=$HOME/LLVM/share/llvm/cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -G "Unix Makefiles" ..
make

On MAC OS X I use:

cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/ravi -DLLVM_DIR=$HOME/LLVM/share/llvm/cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -G "Xcode" ..

I open the generated project in Xcode and do a build from there.

The Ravi build creates a shared library, the Lua executable and some test programs.

The lua command recognizes following environment variables. Note that these are only for internal debugging purposes.

RAVI_DEBUG_EXPR

if set to a value this triggers debug output of expression parsing

RAVI_DEBUG_CODEGEN

if set to a value this triggers a dump of the code being generated

RAVI_DEBUG_VARS

if set this triggers a dump of local variables construction and destruction

Also see section above on available API for dumping either Lua bytecode or LLVM IR for compiled code.

• Feb-Jun 2015 - implement JIT compilation using LLVM
• Jun-Jul 2015 - libgccjit based alternative JIT
• Jun-Nov 2015 - testing and create libraries
• Dec 2015 - beta release

MIT License for LLVM version.

Since the reason for introducing optional static typing is to enhance performance primarily - not all types benefit from this capability. In fact it is quite hard to extend this to generic recursive structures such as tables without encurring significant overhead. For instance - even to represent a recursive type in the parser will require dynamic memory allocation and add great overhead to the parser.

From a performance point of view the only types that seem worth specializing are:

• integer (64-bit int)
• number (double)
• array of integers
• array of numbers

Everything else will just be dynamic type as in Lua. Ravi currently has syntactic support for following additional type declarations to make the language more user friendly, but the type checking is not yet implemented for these:

• string
• table
• closure
• boolean
• userdata

I want to build on existing Lua types rather than introducing completely new types to the Lua system. I quite like the minimalist nature of Lua. However, to make the execution efficient I am adding new type specific opcodes and enhancing the Lua parser/code generator to encode these opcodes only when types are known. The new opcodes will execute more efficiently as they will not need to perform type checks. Morever, type specific instructions will lend themselves to more efficient JIT compilation.

I am adding new opcodes that cover arithmetic operations, array operations, variable assignments, etc..

An immediate issue is that the Lua bytecode structure has a 6-bit opcode which is insufficient to hold the various opcodes that I will need. Simply extending the size of this is problematic as then it reduces the space available to the operands A B and C. Furthermore the way Lua bytecodes work means that B and C operands must be 1-bit larger than A - as the extra bit is used to flag whether the operand refers to a constant or a register. (Thanks to Dirk Laurie for pointing this out).

I am amending the bit mapping in the 32-bit instruction to allow 9-bits for the byte-code, 7-bits for operand A, and 8-bits for operands B and C. This means that some of the Lua limits (maximum number of variables in a function, etc.) have to be revised to be lower than the default.

The new instructions are specialised for types, and also for register/versus constant. So for example OP_RAVI_ADDFI means add number and integer. And OP_RAVI_ADDFF means add number and number. The existing Lua opcodes that these are based on define which operands are used.

Example:

local i=0; i=i+1

Above standard Lua code compiles to:

[0] LOADK A=0 Bx=-1
[1] ADD A=0 B=0 C=-2
[2] RETURN A=0 B=1

We add type info using Ravi extensions:

local i:integer=0; i=i+1

Now the code compiles to:

[0] LOADK A=0 Bx=-1
[1] ADDII A=0 B=0 C=-2
[2] RETURN A=0 B=1

Above uses type specialised opcode OP_RAVI_ADDII.