void attack_result::do_execute()
{
LOG_AI_ACTIONS << "start of execution of: "<< *this << std::endl;
// Stop the user from issuing any commands while the unit is attacking
const events::command_disabler disable_commands;
//@note: yes, this is a decision done here. It's that way because we want to allow a simpler attack 'with whatever weapon is considered best', and because we want to allow the defender to pick it's weapon. That's why aggression is needed. a cleaner solution is needed.
battle_context bc(resources::gameboard->units(), attacker_loc_,
defender_loc_, attacker_weapon_, -1, aggression_);
int attacker_weapon = bc.get_attacker_stats().attack_num;
int defender_weapon = bc.get_defender_stats().attack_num;
if(attacker_weapon < 0) {
set_error(E_UNABLE_TO_CHOOSE_ATTACKER_WEAPON);
return;
}
const unit_map::const_iterator a_ = resources::gameboard->units().find(attacker_loc_);
const unit_map::const_iterator d_ = resources::gameboard->units().find(defender_loc_);
if(resources::simulation_){
bool gamestate_changed = simulated_attack(attacker_loc_, defender_loc_, bc.get_attacker_combatant().average_hp(), bc.get_defender_combatant().average_hp());
sim_gamestate_changed(this, gamestate_changed);
return;
}
//FIXME: find a way to 'ask' the ai which advancement should be chosen from synced_commands.cpp .
if(!synced_context::is_synced()) //RAII block for set_scontext_synced
{
wb::real_map rm;
//we don't use synced_context::run_in_synced_context because that wouldn't allow us to pass advancements_
resources::recorder->add_synced_command("attack", replay_helper::get_attack(attacker_loc_, defender_loc_, attacker_weapon, defender_weapon, a_->type_id(),
d_->type_id(), a_->level(), d_->level(), resources::tod_manager->turn(),
resources::tod_manager->get_time_of_day()));
set_scontext_synced sync;
attack_unit_and_advance(attacker_loc_, defender_loc_, attacker_weapon, defender_weapon, true, advancements_);
resources::controller->check_victory();
resources::controller->maybe_throw_return_to_play_side();
sync.do_final_checkup();
}
else
{
attack_unit_and_advance(attacker_loc_, defender_loc_, attacker_weapon, defender_weapon, true, advancements_);
}
set_gamestate_changed();
//start of ugly hack. @todo 1.9 rework that via extended event system
//until event system is reworked, we note the attack this way
get_info().recent_attacks.insert(defender_loc_);
//end of ugly hack
try {
manager::raise_gamestate_changed();
} catch (...) {
if (!is_ok()) { DBG_AI_ACTIONS << "Return value of AI ACTION was not checked." << std::endl; } //Demotes to DBG "unchecked result" warning
throw;
}
}
void attack_result::do_execute()
{
LOG_AI_ACTIONS << "start of execution of: "<< *this << std::endl;
// Stop the user from issuing any commands while the unit is attacking
const events::command_disabler disable_commands;
//@note: yes, this is a decision done here. It's that way because we want to allow a simpler attack 'with whatever weapon is considered best', and because we want to allow the defender to pick it's weapon. That's why aggression is needed. a cleaner solution is needed.
battle_context bc(*resources::units, attacker_loc_,
defender_loc_, attacker_weapon_, -1, aggression_);
int attacker_weapon = bc.get_attacker_stats().attack_num;
int defender_weapon = bc.get_defender_stats().attack_num;
if(attacker_weapon < 0) {
set_error(E_UNABLE_TO_CHOOSE_ATTACKER_WEAPON);
return;
}
const unit_map::const_iterator a_ = resources::units->find(attacker_loc_);
const unit_map::const_iterator d_ = resources::units->find(defender_loc_);
//to get rid of an unused member varuiable warning, FIXME: find a way to 'ask' the ai wich advancement should be chosen from synced_commands.cpp .
if(true) //RAII block for set_scontext_synced
{
//we don't use synced_context::run_in_synced_context because that wouldn't allow us to pass advancements_
recorder.add_synced_command("attack", replay_helper::get_attack(attacker_loc_, defender_loc_, attacker_weapon, defender_weapon, a_->type_id(),
d_->type_id(), a_->level(), d_->level(), resources::tod_manager->turn(),
resources::tod_manager->get_time_of_day()));
set_scontext_synced sync;
attack_unit_and_advance(attacker_loc_, defender_loc_, attacker_weapon, defender_weapon, true, advancements_);
}
set_gamestate_changed();
//start of ugly hack. @todo 1.9 rework that via extended event system
//until event system is reworked, we note the attack this way
get_info().recent_attacks.insert(defender_loc_);
//end of ugly hack
try {
manager::raise_gamestate_changed();
} catch (...) {
is_ok(); //Silences "unchecked result" warning
throw;
}
}
