Beispiel #1
0
// look up FQDN for hostname and aliases.
// if not, it adds up DEFAULT_DOMAIN_NAME
MyString get_full_hostname(const condor_sockaddr& addr)
{
		// this function will go smooth even with NODNS.
	MyString ret;
	std::vector<MyString> hostnames = get_hostname_with_alias(addr);
	if (hostnames.empty()) return ret;
	std::vector<MyString>::iterator iter;
	for (iter = hostnames.begin(); iter != hostnames.end(); ++iter) {
		MyString& str = *iter;
		if (str.FindChar('.') != -1) {
			return str;
		}
	}

	MyString default_domain;
	if (param(default_domain, "DEFAULT_DOMAIN_NAME")) {
			// first element is the hostname got by gethostname()
		ret = *hostnames.begin();
		if (default_domain[0] != '.')
			ret += ".";
		ret += default_domain;
	}
	return ret;
}
Beispiel #2
0
int
IpVerify::Verify( DCpermission perm, const condor_sockaddr& addr, const char * user, MyString *allow_reason, MyString *deny_reason )
{
	perm_mask_t mask;
	in6_addr sin6_addr;
	const char *thehost;
    const char * who = user;
	MyString peer_description; // we build this up as we go along (DNS etc.)

	if( !did_init ) {
		Init();
	}
	/*
	 * Be Warned:  careful about parameter "sin" being NULL.  It could be, in
	 * which case we should return FALSE (unless perm is ALLOW)
	 *
	 */

	switch ( perm ) {

	case ALLOW:
		return USER_AUTH_SUCCESS;
		break;

	default:
		break;
	}

	sin6_addr = addr.to_ipv6_address();
	mask = 0;	// must initialize to zero because we logical-or bits into this

    if (who == NULL || *who == '\0') {
        who = TotallyWild;
    }

	if ( perm >= LAST_PERM || !PermTypeArray[perm] ) {
		EXCEPT("IpVerify::Verify: called with unknown permission %d\n",perm);
	}


		// see if a authorization hole has been dyamically punched (via
		// PunchHole) for this perm / user / IP
		// Note that the permission hierarchy is dealt with in
		// PunchHole(), by punching a hole for all implied levels.
		// Therefore, if there is a hole or an implied hole, we will
		// always find it here before we get into the subsequent code
		// which recursively calls Verify() to traverse the hierarchy.
		// This is important, because we do not want holes to find
		// there way into the authorization cache.
		//
	if ( PunchedHoleArray[perm] != NULL ) {
		HolePunchTable_t* hpt = PunchedHoleArray[perm];
		MyString ip_str_buf = addr.to_ip_string();
		const char* ip_str = ip_str_buf.Value();
		MyString id_with_ip;
		MyString id;
		int count;
		if ( who != TotallyWild ) {
			id_with_ip.sprintf("%s/%s", who, ip_str);
			id = who;
			if ( hpt->lookup(id, count) != -1 )	{
				if( allow_reason ) {
					allow_reason->sprintf(
						"%s authorization has been made automatic for %s",
						PermString(perm), id.Value() );
				}
				return USER_AUTH_SUCCESS;
			}
			if ( hpt->lookup(id_with_ip, count) != -1 ) {
				if( allow_reason ) {
					allow_reason->sprintf(
						"%s authorization has been made automatic for %s",
						PermString(perm), id_with_ip.Value() );
				}
				return USER_AUTH_SUCCESS;
			}
		}
		id = ip_str;
		if ( hpt->lookup(id, count) != -1 ) {
			if( allow_reason ) {
				allow_reason->sprintf(
					"%s authorization has been made automatic for %s",
					PermString(perm), id.Value() );
			}
			return USER_AUTH_SUCCESS;
		}
	}

	if ( PermTypeArray[perm]->behavior == USERVERIFY_ALLOW ) {
			// allow if no HOSTALLOW_* or HOSTDENY_* restrictions 
			// specified.
		if( allow_reason ) {
			allow_reason->sprintf(
				"%s authorization policy allows access by anyone",
				PermString(perm));
		}
		return USER_AUTH_SUCCESS;
	}
		
	if ( PermTypeArray[perm]->behavior == USERVERIFY_DENY ) {
			// deny
		if( deny_reason ) {
			deny_reason->sprintf(
				"%s authorization policy denies all access",
				PermString(perm));
		}
		return USER_AUTH_FAILURE;
	}
		
	if( LookupCachedVerifyResult(perm,sin6_addr,who,mask) ) {
		if( deny_reason && (mask&deny_mask(perm)) ) {
			deny_reason->sprintf(
				"cached result for %s; see first case for the full reason",
				PermString(perm));
		}
		else if( allow_reason && (mask&allow_mask(perm)) ) {
			allow_reason->sprintf(
				"cached result for %s; see first case for the full reason",
				PermString(perm));
		}
	}
	else {
		mask = 0;

			// if the deny bit is already set, skip further DENY analysis
		perm_mask_t const deny_resolved = deny_mask(perm);
			// if the allow or deny bit is already set,
			// skip further ALLOW analysis
		perm_mask_t const allow_resolved = allow_mask(perm)|deny_mask(perm);

			// check for matching subnets in ip/mask style
		char ipstr[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN] = { 0, };
   		addr.to_ip_string(ipstr, INET6_ADDRSTRLEN);

		peer_description = addr.to_ip_string();

		if ( !(mask&deny_resolved) && lookup_user_ip_deny(perm,who,ipstr)) {
			mask |= deny_mask(perm);
			if( deny_reason ) {
				deny_reason->sprintf(
					"%s authorization policy denies IP address %s",
					PermString(perm), addr.to_ip_string().Value() );
			}
		}

		if ( !(mask&allow_resolved) && lookup_user_ip_allow(perm,who,ipstr)) {
			mask |= allow_mask(perm);
			if( allow_reason ) {
				allow_reason->sprintf(
					"%s authorization policy allows IP address %s",
					PermString(perm), addr.to_ip_string().Value() );
			}
		}


		std::vector<MyString> hostnames;
		// now scan through hostname strings
		if( !(mask&allow_resolved) || !(mask&deny_resolved) ) {
			hostnames = get_hostname_with_alias(addr);
		}

		for (unsigned int i = 0; i < hostnames.size(); ++i) {
			thehost = hostnames[i].Value();
			peer_description.append_to_list(thehost);

			if ( !(mask&deny_resolved) && lookup_user_host_deny(perm,who,thehost) ) {
				mask |= deny_mask(perm);
				if( deny_reason ) {
					deny_reason->sprintf(
						"%s authorization policy denies hostname %s",
						PermString(perm), thehost );
				}
			}

			if ( !(mask&allow_resolved) && lookup_user_host_allow(perm,who,thehost) ) {
				mask |= allow_mask(perm);
				if( allow_reason ) {
					allow_reason->sprintf(
						"%s authorization policy allows hostname %s",
						PermString(perm), thehost );
				}
			}
		}
			// if we found something via our hostname or subnet mactching, we now have 
			// a mask, and we should add it into our table so we need not
			// do a gethostbyaddr() next time.  if we still do not have a mask
			// (perhaps because this host doesn't appear in any list), create one
			// and then add to the table.
			// But first, check our parent permission levels in the
			// authorization heirarchy.
			// DAEMON and ADMINISTRATOR imply WRITE.
			// WRITE, NEGOTIATOR, and CONFIG_PERM imply READ.
		bool determined_by_parent = false;
		if ( mask == 0 ) {
			if ( PermTypeArray[perm]->behavior == USERVERIFY_ONLY_DENIES ) {
				dprintf(D_SECURITY,"IPVERIFY: %s at %s not matched to deny list, so allowing.\n",who, addr.to_sinful().Value());
				if( allow_reason ) {
					allow_reason->sprintf(
						"%s authorization policy does not deny, so allowing",
						PermString(perm));
				}

				mask |= allow_mask(perm);
			} else {
				DCpermissionHierarchy hierarchy( perm );
				DCpermission const *parent_perms =
					hierarchy.getPermsIAmDirectlyImpliedBy();
				bool parent_allowed = false;
				for( ; *parent_perms != LAST_PERM; parent_perms++ ) {
					if( Verify( *parent_perms, addr, user, allow_reason, NULL ) == USER_AUTH_SUCCESS ) {
						determined_by_parent = true;
						parent_allowed = true;
						dprintf(D_SECURITY,"IPVERIFY: allowing %s at %s for %s because %s is allowed\n",who, addr.to_sinful().Value(),PermString(perm),PermString(*parent_perms));
						if( allow_reason ) {
							MyString tmp = *allow_reason;
							allow_reason->sprintf(
								"%s is implied by %s; %s",
								PermString(perm),
								PermString(*parent_perms),
								tmp.Value());
						}
						break;
					}
				}
				if( parent_allowed ) {
					mask |= allow_mask(perm);
				}
				else {
					mask |= deny_mask(perm);

					if( !determined_by_parent && deny_reason ) {
							// We don't just allow anyone, and this request
							// did not match any of the entries we do allow.
							// In case the reason we didn't match is
							// because of a typo or a DNS problem, record
							// all the hostnames we searched for.
						deny_reason->sprintf(
							"%s authorization policy contains no matching "
							"ALLOW entry for this request"
							"; identifiers used for this host: %s, hostname size = %lu, "
							"original ip address = %s",
							PermString(perm),
							peer_description.Value(),
							(unsigned long)hostnames.size(),
							ipstr);
					}
				}
			}
		}

		if( !determined_by_parent && (mask&allow_mask(perm)) ) {
			// In case we are allowing because of not matching a DENY
			// entry that the user expected us to match (e.g. because
			// of typo or DNS problem), record all the hostnames we
			// searched for.
			if( allow_reason && !peer_description.IsEmpty() ) {
				allow_reason->sprintf_cat(
					"; identifiers used for this remote host: %s",
					peer_description.Value());
			}
		}

			// finally, add the mask we computed into the table with this IP addr
			add_hash_entry(sin6_addr, who, mask);			
	}  // end of if find_match is FALSE

		// decode the mask and return True or False to the user.
	if ( mask & deny_mask(perm) ) {
		return USER_AUTH_FAILURE;
	}

	if ( mask & allow_mask(perm) ) {
		return USER_AUTH_SUCCESS;
	}

	return USER_AUTH_FAILURE;
}