static int loop(struct walker *walker)
{
struct object_list *elem;
while (process_queue) {
struct object *obj = process_queue->item;
elem = process_queue;
process_queue = elem->next;
free(elem);
if (!process_queue)
process_queue_end = &process_queue;
/* If we are not scanning this object, we placed it in
* the queue because we needed to fetch it first.
*/
if (! (obj->flags & TO_SCAN)) {
if (walker->fetch(walker, obj->sha1)) {
report_missing(obj);
return -1;
}
}
if (!obj->type)
parse_object(obj->sha1);
if (process_object(walker, obj))
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
bool finder_base::validate_memregion(size_t bytes, bool required) const
{
// make sure we can resolve the full path to the region
size_t bytes_found = 0;
std::string const region_fulltag(m_base.get().subtag(m_tag));
// look for the region
for (device_t const &dev : device_iterator(m_base.get().mconfig().root_device()))
{
for (romload::region const ®ion : romload::entries(dev.rom_region()).get_regions())
{
if (dev.subtag(region.get_tag()) == region_fulltag)
{
bytes_found = region.get_length();
break;
}
}
if (bytes_found != 0)
break;
}
// check the length and warn if other than specified
if ((bytes_found != 0) && (bytes != 0) && (bytes != bytes_found))
{
osd_printf_warning("Region '%s' found but has %ld bytes, not %ld as requested\n", m_tag, long(bytes_found), long(bytes));
bytes_found = 0;
}
return report_missing(bytes_found != 0, "memory region", required);
}
void
edit_typeset_rep::typeset (SI& x1, SI& y1, SI& x2, SI& y2) {
int missing_nr= INT_MAX;
int redefined_nr= INT_MAX;
while (true) {
typeset_sub (x1, y1, x2, y2);
if (!env->complete) break;
env->complete= false;
if (N(env->missing) == 0 && N(env->redefined) == 0) break;
if ((N(env->missing) == missing_nr && N(env->redefined) == redefined_nr) ||
(N(env->missing) > missing_nr || N(env->redefined) > redefined_nr)) {
report_missing (env->missing);
report_redefined (env->redefined);
break;
}
missing_nr= N(env->missing);
redefined_nr= N(env->redefined);
::notify_assign (ttt, path(), ttt->br->st);
}
}
/*
* Add new tests cases here. We increment the test number and pass the
* type of ordering we want so that each test can be tested with multiple
* ordering values in order to demostrate the difference.
*
* The return value is cumulative, and serves as a failure count that is
* returned at the end of all the tests.
*/
static int
run_test (int& test_number, int ordering)
{
int retval = 0;
ACE_DEBUG ((LM_INFO,
" ########## Running Tests with ordering = %C ##########\n",
ordering == 1 ? "REQUIRE_ORDER" :
ordering == 2 ? "PERMUTE_ARGS" :
"RETURN_IN_ORDER"));
// Basic test, but don't use the program name and don't skip any args.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-f -rreq-arg -oopt-arg -lopt-arg --long_only=lo_arg -s arg1 arg2"),
0);
// Same, but combining short args that don't take args
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fsrreq-arg -oopt-arg -lopt-arg --long_only=lo_arg arg1 arg2"));
// Now we use defaults for options with optional args.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fsrreq-arg -o -l --long_only=lo_arg arg1 arg2"));
// Let's mix up the options and non-options an see what happens.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fs arg1 -rreq-arg -o arg2 -l --long_only=lo_arg"));
// Now we turn off options parsing explicitely by passing "--" in the middle.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fs -rreq-arg -- arg1 -o arg2 -l --long_only=lo_arg"));
// Let's try the same thing but mix up the options and non-options.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fs arg1 arg2 -rreq-arg -- arg3 -o"));
// One more time but with "-W".
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fs arg1 arg2 -rreq-arg -W long_option=opt-arg -- arg3 -o"));
// Let's pass some long options.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("--flag -s --requires_arg=req-arg --optional_arg --long_only lo_arg arg1 arg2"));
// And long options without the '='.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("--flag -s --requires_arg req-arg --optional_arg --long_only=lo_arg arg1 arg2"));
// Pass "-W" to cause the next argument to be read as a long option.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fso -W requires_arg=req-arg -Woptional_arg -l arg1 arg2"));
// This is the special case of a non-alpha numeric short option.
retval += parse_args
(test_number++, ordering,
ACE_TEXT ("-fso --non_alpha-num_short=xxx arg1 arg2"));
// Now, let's test some error conditions (we turn off report_errors since they are
// intentional, we don't want to break the test script)
int report_errors = 0;
// Bad short option.
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("-X"), 1, report_errors);
// Short option with missing required arg.
ACE_TString report_missing (ACE_TEXT (":"));
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("-r"), 1, report_errors, report_missing);
// Short option with missing required arg with trailing "--".
// This reads "--" as the arg, but should it?
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("-r --"), 1, report_errors);
// Long option with missing required arg.
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("--long_only"), 1, report_errors);
// Long option that doesn't take an arg has one.
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("--long_no_arg=bad_arg"), 1, report_errors);
// Unknown long option.
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("--unknown"), 1, report_errors);
// Ambigous long option.
retval += parse_args (test_number++, ordering, ACE_TEXT ("--long"), 1, report_errors);
return retval;
}