static void do_scheduled_release(struct vperfctr *child_perfctr)
{
struct task_struct *parent_tsk = child_perfctr->parent_tsk;
task_lock(parent_tsk);
do_vperfctr_release(child_perfctr, parent_tsk);
task_unlock(parent_tsk);
put_task_struct(parent_tsk);
}
static void scheduled_release(struct work_struct *data)
{
struct vperfctr *child_perfctr =
container_of(data, struct vperfctr, work);
struct task_struct *parent_tsk = child_perfctr->parent_tsk;
// why are we getting a lock on the parent task structure ?
// of course, we incremented the reference count to parent's task_struct
task_lock(parent_tsk);
do_vperfctr_release(child_perfctr, parent_tsk);
task_unlock(parent_tsk);
// good, the incremented reference count of the parent task is now
// decremented, now that we are done adding up our counts to that
// of the parent
put_task_struct(parent_tsk);
}
void __vperfctr_release(struct task_struct *child_tsk)
{
struct task_struct *parent_tsk = child_tsk->parent;
struct vperfctr *child_perfctr = child_tsk->thread.perfctr;
// this is invoked either in the waitpid() or if there the parent is not
// interesting in its children. In the latter case, "parent_tsk != current"
// one releases oneself, when the parent is not interested in one's data
// but even then we would like to add our counters to those of the parent's
// another step towards freeing the task_struct(ure).
child_tsk->thread.perfctr = NULL;
// if the parent is releasing the children's task structure, then it (the
// parent) can go ahead and add the children's vperfctr's values to the
// 'children' field in the parent's 'vperfctr' structure.
// So, am 'I' the parent of the task_structure I am attempting to release?
// When current == parent_tsk, the child's counts can be merged
// into the parent's immediately. This is the common case.
// printk ("%s, %d\n", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__);
if (child_perfctr == NULL) {
// printk("%s, %d, child_perfctr == NULL\n", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__);
}
if (parent_tsk == current)
do_vperfctr_release(child_perfctr, parent_tsk);
else {
/* When current != parent_tsk, the parent must be task_lock()ed
* before its perfctr state can be accessed. task_lock() is illegal
* here due to the write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock) in release_task(),
* so the operation is done via schedule_work(). Also, increment
* the reference count of parent's task_struct so that it will not be
* freed for good
*/
get_task_struct(parent_tsk); // increments the reference count
INIT_WORK(&child_perfctr->work, scheduled_release);
child_perfctr->parent_tsk = parent_tsk;
schedule_work(&child_perfctr->work);
}
}
void __vperfctr_release(struct task_struct *child_tsk)
{
#if 0
struct task_struct *parent_tsk = child_tsk->parent;
struct vperfctr *child_perfctr = child_tsk->arch.thread.perfctr;
child_tsk->arch.thread.perfctr = NULL;
if (parent_tsk == current)
do_vperfctr_release(child_perfctr, parent_tsk);
else {
get_task_struct(parent_tsk);
INIT_WORK(&child_perfctr->work, scheduled_release);
child_perfctr->parent_tsk = parent_tsk;
schedule_work(&child_perfctr->work);
}
#endif
}
