/*
Initializes lf_hash, the arguments are compatible with hash_init
@note element_size sets both the size of allocated memory block for
lf_alloc and a size of memcpy'ed block size in lf_hash_insert. Typically
they are the same, indeed. But LF_HASH::element_size can be decreased
after lf_hash_init, and then lf_alloc will allocate larger block that
lf_hash_insert will copy over. It is desireable if part of the element
is expensive to initialize - for example if there is a mutex or
DYNAMIC_ARRAY. In this case they should be initialize in the
LF_ALLOCATOR::constructor, and lf_hash_insert should not overwrite them.
See wt_init() for example.
*/
void lf_hash_init(LF_HASH *hash, uint element_size, uint flags,
uint key_offset, uint key_length, my_hash_get_key get_key,
CHARSET_INFO *charset)
{
lf_alloc_init(&hash->alloc, sizeof(LF_SLIST)+element_size,
offsetof(LF_SLIST, key));
lf_dynarray_init(&hash->array, sizeof(LF_SLIST *));
hash->size= 1;
hash->count= 0;
hash->element_size= element_size;
hash->flags= flags;
hash->charset= charset ? charset : &my_charset_bin;
hash->key_offset= key_offset;
hash->key_length= key_length;
hash->get_key= get_key;
DBUG_ASSERT(get_key ? !key_offset && !key_length : key_length);
}
void do_tests()
{
plan(4);
lf_alloc_init(&lf_allocator, sizeof(TLA), offsetof(TLA, not_used));
lf_hash_init(&lf_hash, sizeof(int), LF_HASH_UNIQUE, 0, sizeof(int), 0,
&my_charset_bin);
bad= my_atomic_initialize();
ok(!bad, "my_atomic_initialize() returned %d", bad);
test_concurrently("lf_pinbox", test_lf_pinbox, N= THREADS, CYCLES);
test_concurrently("lf_alloc", test_lf_alloc, N= THREADS, CYCLES);
test_concurrently("lf_hash", test_lf_hash, N= THREADS, CYCLES/10);
lf_hash_destroy(&lf_hash);
lf_alloc_destroy(&lf_allocator);
}
