static void compute_cwl(
ComplexWithLog cwl[3],
EdgeIndex e)
{
/*
* Compute cwl[(e+1)%3] and cwl[(e+2)%3] in terms of cwl[e].
*/
int i;
for (i = 1; i < 3; i++)
{
cwl[(e+i)%3].rect = complex_div(One, complex_minus(One, cwl[(e+i-1)%3].rect));
cwl[(e+i)%3].log = complex_log(cwl[(e+i)%3].rect, PI_OVER_2);
}
}
static void compute_translation(
PositionedTet *initial_ptet,
PeripheralCurve which_curve,
TraceDirection which_direction,
Complex translation[2], /* returns translations based on ultimate */
/* and penultimate shapes */
FillingStatus which_structure)
{
PositionedTet ptet;
int i,
initial_strand,
strand,
*this_vertex,
near_strands,
left_strands;
Complex left_endpoint[2], /* left_endpoint[ultimate/penultimate] */
right_endpoint[2], /* right_endpoint[ultimate/penultimate] */
old_diff,
new_diff,
rotation;
/*
* Place the near edge of the top vertex of the initial_ptet in the
* complex plane with its left endpoint at zero and its right endpoint at one.
* Trace the curve which_curve in the direction which_direction, using the
* shapes of the ideal tetrahedra to compute the position of endpoints of
* each edge we cross. When we return to our starting point in the manifold,
* the position of the left endpoint (or the position of the right endpoint
* minus one) will tell us the translation.
*
* Note that we are working in the orientation double cover of the cusp.
*
* Here's how we keep track of where we are. At each step, we are always
* at the near edge of the top vertex (i.e. the truncated vertex opposite
* the bottom face) of the PositionedTet ptet. The curve (i.e. the
* meridian or longitude) may cross that edge several times. The variable
* "strand" keeps track of which intersection we are at; 0 means we're at
* the strand on the far left, 1 means we're at the next strand, etc.
*/
ptet = *initial_ptet;
initial_strand = 0;
strand = initial_strand;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) /* i = ultimate, penultimate */
{
left_endpoint[i] = Zero;
right_endpoint[i] = One;
}
do
{
/*
* Note the curve's intersection numbers with the near side and left side.
*/
this_vertex = ptet.tet->curve[which_curve][ptet.orientation][ptet.bottom_face];
near_strands = this_vertex[ptet.near_face];
left_strands = this_vertex[ptet.left_face];
/*
* If we are tracing the curve backwards, negate the intersection numbers
* so the rest of compute_translation() can enjoy the illusion that we
* are tracing the curve forwards.
*/
if (which_direction == trace_backwards)
{
near_strands = - near_strands;
left_strands = - left_strands;
}
/*
* Does the current strand bend to the left or to the right?
*/
if (strand < FLOW(near_strands, left_strands))
{
/*
* The current strand bends to the left.
*/
/*
* The left_endpoint remains fixed.
* Update the right_endpoint.
*
* The plan is to compute the vector old_diff which runs
* from left_endpoint to right_endpoint, multiply it by the
* complex edge parameter to get the vector new_diff which
* runs from left_endpoint to the new value of right_endpoint,
* and then add new_diff to left_endpoint to get the new
* value of right_endpoint itself.
*
* Note that the complex edge parameters are always expressed
* relative to the right_handed Orientation, so if we are
* viewing this Tetrahedron relative to the left_handed
* Orientation, we must take the conjugate-inverse of the
* edge parameter.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) /* i = ultimate, penultimate */
{
old_diff = complex_minus(right_endpoint[i], left_endpoint[i]);
rotation = ptet.tet->shape[which_structure]->cwl[i][edge3_between_faces[ptet.near_face][ptet.left_face]].rect;
if (ptet.orientation == left_handed)
{
rotation = complex_div(One, rotation); /* invert . . . */
rotation.imag = - rotation.imag; /* . . . and conjugate */
}
new_diff = complex_mult(old_diff, rotation);
right_endpoint[i] = complex_plus(left_endpoint[i], new_diff);
}
/*
* strand remains unchanged.
*/
/*
* Move the PositionedTet onward, following the curve.
*/
veer_left(&ptet);
}
else
{
/*
* The current strand bends to the right.
*
* Proceed as above, but note that
*
* (1) We now divide by the complex edge parameter
* instead of multiplying by it.
*
* (2) We must adjust the variable "strand". Some of the strands
* from the near edge may be peeling off to the left (in which
* case left_strands is negative), or some strands from the left
* edge may be joining those from the near edge in passing to
* the right edge (in which case left_strands is positive).
* Either way, the code "strand += left_strands" is correct.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) /* i = ultimate, penultimate */
{
old_diff = complex_minus(left_endpoint[i], right_endpoint[i]);
rotation = ptet.tet->shape[which_structure]->cwl[i][edge3_between_faces[ptet.near_face][ptet.right_face]].rect;
if (ptet.orientation == left_handed)
{
rotation = complex_div(One, rotation);
rotation.imag = - rotation.imag;
}
new_diff = complex_div(old_diff, rotation);
left_endpoint[i] = complex_plus(right_endpoint[i], new_diff);
}
strand += left_strands;
veer_right(&ptet);
}
}
while ( ! same_positioned_tet(&ptet, initial_ptet) || strand != initial_strand);
/*
* Write the computed translations, and return.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) /* i = ultimate, penultimate */
translation[i] = left_endpoint[i];
}
static void compute_rhs(
Triangulation *manifold)
{
EdgeClass *edge;
Cusp *cusp;
Complex desired_holonomy,
current_holonomy,
rhs;
/*
* The right hand side of each equation will be the desired value
* of the edge angle sum or the holonomy (depending on whether it's
* an edge equation or a cusp equation) minus the current value.
* Thus, when the equations are solved and the Shapes of the
* Tetrahedra are updated, the edge angle sums and the holonomies
* will take on their desired values, to the accuracy of the
* linear approximation.
*/
/*
* Set the right hand side (rhs) of each edge equation.
*/
for ( edge = manifold->edge_list_begin.next;
edge != &manifold->edge_list_end;
edge = edge->next)
{
/*
* The desired value of the sum of the logs of the complex
* edge parameters is 2 pi i. The current value is
* edge->edge_angle_sum.
*/
rhs = complex_minus(TwoPiI_on[ (int) edge->singular_order], edge->edge_angle_sum); /* DJH */
if (manifold->orientability == oriented_manifold || manifold->orientability == oriented_orbifold )
edge->complex_edge_equation[manifold->num_tetrahedra] = rhs;
else
{
edge->real_edge_equation_re[2 * manifold->num_tetrahedra] = rhs.real;
edge->real_edge_equation_im[2 * manifold->num_tetrahedra] = rhs.imag;
}
}
/*
* Set the right hand side (rhs) of each cusp equation.
*/
for (cusp = manifold->cusp_list_begin.next;
cusp != &manifold->cusp_list_end;
cusp = cusp->next) /* DJH */
if ( cusp->topology == torus_cusp || cusp->topology == Klein_cusp )
{
/*
* For complete cusps we want the log of the holonomy of the
* meridian to be zero. For Dehn filled cusps we want the
* log of the holonomy of the Dehn filling curve to be 2 pi i.
*/
if (cusp->is_complete)
{
desired_holonomy = Zero;
current_holonomy = cusp->holonomy[ultimate][M];
}
else
{
desired_holonomy = TwoPiI;
current_holonomy = complex_plus(
complex_real_mult(cusp->m, cusp->holonomy[ultimate][M]),
complex_real_mult(cusp->l, cusp->holonomy[ultimate][L])
);
}
rhs = complex_minus(desired_holonomy, current_holonomy);
if (manifold->orientability == oriented_manifold || manifold->orientability == oriented_orbifold ) /* DJH */
cusp->complex_cusp_equation[manifold->num_tetrahedra] = rhs;
else
{
cusp->real_cusp_equation_re[2 * manifold->num_tetrahedra] = rhs.real;
cusp->real_cusp_equation_im[2 * manifold->num_tetrahedra] = rhs.imag;
}
}
}
static void compute_derivative(
Triangulation *manifold)
{
Tetrahedron *tet;
Complex z[3],
d[3],
*eqn_coef = NULL,
dz[2];
EdgeIndex e;
VertexIndex v;
FaceIndex initial_side,
terminal_side;
int init[2][2],
term[2][2];
double m,
l,
a,
b,
*eqn_coef_00 = NULL,
*eqn_coef_01 = NULL,
*eqn_coef_10 = NULL,
*eqn_coef_11 = NULL;
int i,
j;
for (tet = manifold->tet_list_begin.next;
tet != &manifold->tet_list_end;
tet = tet->next)
{
/*
* Note the three edge parameters.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
z[i] = tet->shape[filled]->cwl[ultimate][i].rect;
/*
* Set the derivatives of log(z0), log(z1) and log(z2)
* with respect to the given coordinate system, as
* indicated by the above table.
*/
switch (tet->coordinate_system)
{
case 0:
d[0] = One;
d[1] = complex_div(MinusOne, z[2]);
d[2] = complex_minus(Zero, z[1]);
break;
case 1:
d[0] = complex_minus(Zero, z[2]);
d[1] = One;
d[2] = complex_div(MinusOne, z[0]);
break;
case 2:
d[0] = complex_div(MinusOne, z[1]);
d[1] = complex_minus(Zero, z[0]);
d[2] = One;
break;
}
/*
* Record this tetrahedron's contribution to the edge equations.
*/
for (e = 0; e < 6; e++) /* Look at each of the six edges. */
{
/*
* Find the matrix entry(ies) corresponding to the
* derivative of the edge equation with respect to this
* tetrahedron. If the manifold is oriented it will be
* a single entry in the complex matrix. If the manifold
* is unoriented it will be a 2 x 2 block in the real matrix.
*/
if (manifold->orientability == oriented_manifold || manifold->orientability == oriented_orbifold ) /* DJH */
eqn_coef = &tet->edge_class[e]->complex_edge_equation[tet->index];
else
{
eqn_coef_00 = &tet->edge_class[e]->real_edge_equation_re[2 * tet->index];
eqn_coef_01 = &tet->edge_class[e]->real_edge_equation_re[2 * tet->index + 1];
eqn_coef_10 = &tet->edge_class[e]->real_edge_equation_im[2 * tet->index];
eqn_coef_11 = &tet->edge_class[e]->real_edge_equation_im[2 * tet->index + 1];
}
/*
* Add in the derivative of the log of the edge parameter
* with respect to the chosen coordinate system. Please
* see the comment preceding this function for details.
*/
if (manifold->orientability == oriented_manifold || manifold->orientability == oriented_orbifold ) /* DJH */
*eqn_coef = complex_plus(*eqn_coef, d[edge3[e]]);
else
{
/*
* These are the same a and b as in the comment
* preceding this function.
*/
a = d[edge3[e]].real;
b = d[edge3[e]].imag;
if (tet->edge_orientation[e] == right_handed)
{
*eqn_coef_00 += a;
*eqn_coef_01 -= b;
*eqn_coef_10 += b;
*eqn_coef_11 += a;
}
else
{
*eqn_coef_00 -= a;
*eqn_coef_01 += b;
*eqn_coef_10 += b;
*eqn_coef_11 += a;
}
}
}
/*
* Record this tetrahedron's contribution to the cusp equations.
*/
for (v = 0; v < 4; v++) /* Look at each ideal vertex. */
{
/*
* Note the Dehn filling coefficients on this cusp.
* If the cusp is complete, use m = 1.0 and l = 0.0.
*/
if (tet->cusp[v]->is_complete) /* DJH : not sure ? */
{
m = 1.0;
l = 0.0;
}
else
{
m = tet->cusp[v]->m;
l = tet->cusp[v]->l;
}
/*
* Find the matrix entry(ies) corresponding to the
* derivative of the cusp equation with respect to this
* tetrahedron. If the manifold is oriented it will be
* a single entry in the complex matrix. If the manifold
* is unoriented it will be a 2 x 2 block in the real matrix.
*/
/* DJH */
if ( (manifold->orientability == oriented_manifold || manifold->orientability == oriented_orbifold ) && (
tet->cusp[v]->topology == torus_cusp || tet->cusp[v]->topology == Klein_cusp ) )
eqn_coef = &tet->cusp[v]->complex_cusp_equation[tet->index];
else
{
eqn_coef_00 = &tet->cusp[v]->real_cusp_equation_re[2 * tet->index];
eqn_coef_01 = &tet->cusp[v]->real_cusp_equation_re[2 * tet->index + 1];
eqn_coef_10 = &tet->cusp[v]->real_cusp_equation_im[2 * tet->index];
eqn_coef_11 = &tet->cusp[v]->real_cusp_equation_im[2 * tet->index + 1];
}
/*
* Each ideal vertex contains two triangular cross sections,
* one right_handed and the other left_handed. We want to
* compute the contribution of each angle of each triangle
* to the holonomy. We begin by considering the right_handed
* triangle, looking at each of its three angles. A directed
* angle is specified by its initial and terminal sides.
* We find the number of strands of the Dehn filling curve
* passing from the initial side to the terminal side;
* it is m * (number of strands of meridian)
* + l * (number of strands of longitude), where (m,l) are
* the Dehn filling coefficients (in practice, m and l need
* not be integers, but it's simpler to imagine them to be
* integers as you try to understand the following code).
* The number of strands of the Dehn filling curves passing
* from the initial to the terminal side is multiplied by
* the derivative of the log of the complex angle, to yield
* the contribution to the derivative matrix. If the manifold
* is oriented, that complex number is added directly to
* the relevant matrix entry. If the manifold is unoriented,
* we convert the complex number to a 2 x 2 real matrix
* (cf. the comments preceding this function) and add it to
* the appropriate 2 x 2 block of the real derivative matrix.
* The 2 x 2 matrix for the left_handed triangle is modified
* to account for the fact that although the real part of the
* derivative of the log (i.e. the compression/expansion
* factor) is the same, the imaginary part (i.e. the rotation)
* is negated. [Note that in computing the edge equations
* the real part was negated, while for the cusp equations
* the imaginary part is negated. I will leave an explanation
* of the difference as an exercise for the reader.]
*
* Note that we cannot possibly handle curves on the
* left_handed sheet of the orientation double cover of
* a cusp of an oriented manifold. The reason is that the
* log of the holonomy of the Dehn filling curve is not
* a complex analytic function of the shape of the tetrahedron
* (it's the complex conjugate of such a function). I.e.
* it doesn't have a derivative in the complex sense. This
* is why we make the convention that all peripheral curves
* in oriented manifolds lie on the right_handed sheet of
* the double cover.
*/
for (initial_side = 0; initial_side < 4; initial_side++)
{
if (initial_side == v)
continue;
terminal_side = remaining_face[v][initial_side];
/*
* Note the intersection numbers of the meridian and
* longitude with the initial and terminal sides.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { /* which curve */
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) { /* which sheet */
init[i][j] = tet->curve[i][j][v][initial_side];
term[i][j] = tet->curve[i][j][v][terminal_side];
}
}
/*
* For each triangle (right_handed and left_handed),
* multiply the number of strands of the Dehn filling
* curve running from initial_side to terminal_side
* by the derivative of the log of the edge parameter.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) /* which sheet */
dz[i] = complex_real_mult(
m * FLOW(init[M][i],term[M][i]) + l * FLOW(init[L][i],term[L][i]),
d[ edge3_between_faces[initial_side][terminal_side] ]
);
/*
* If the manifold is oriented, the Dehn filling curve
* must lie of the right_handed sheet of the orientation
* double cover (cf. above). Add its contributation to
* the cusp equation.
*/
/* DJH */
if (manifold->orientability == oriented_manifold || manifold->orientability == oriented_orbifold )
*eqn_coef = complex_plus(*eqn_coef, dz[right_handed]);
/* "else" follows below */
/*
* If the manifold is unoriented, treat the right_ and
* left_handed sheets separately. Add in the contribution
* of the right_handed sheet normally. For the left_handed
* sheet, we must account for the fact that even though
* the modulus of the derivative (i.e. the expansion/
* contraction factor) is correct, its argument (i.e. the
* angle of rotation) is the negative of what it should be.
*/
else
{
a = dz[right_handed].real;
b = dz[right_handed].imag;
*eqn_coef_00 += a;
*eqn_coef_01 -= b;
*eqn_coef_10 += b;
*eqn_coef_11 += a;
a = dz[left_handed].real;
b = dz[left_handed].imag;
*eqn_coef_00 += a;
*eqn_coef_01 -= b;
*eqn_coef_10 -= b;
*eqn_coef_11 -= a;
}
}
}
}
}
void compute_fourth_corner(
Complex corner[4],
VertexIndex missing_corner,
Orientation orientation,
ComplexWithLog cwl[3])
{
int i;
VertexIndex v[4];
Complex z[4],
cross_ratio,
diff20,
diff21,
numerator,
denominator;
/*
* Given the locations on the sphere at infinity in
* the upper half space model of three of a Tetrahedron's
* four ideal vertices, compute_fourth_corner() computes
* the location of the remaining corner.
*
* corner[4] is the array which contains the three known
* corners, and into which the fourth will be
* written.
*
* missing_corner is the index of the unknown corner.
*
* orientation is the Orientation with which the Tetrahedron
* is currently being viewed.
*
* cwl[3] describes the shape of the Tetrahedron.
*/
/*
* Set up an indexing scheme v[] for the vertices.
*
* If some vertex (!= missing_corner) is positioned at infinity, let its
* index be v0. Otherwise choose v0 arbitrarily. Then choose
* v2 and v3 so that the Tetrahedron looks right_handed relative
* to the v[].
*/
v[3] = missing_corner;
v[0] = ! missing_corner;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
if (i != missing_corner && complex_infinite(corner[i]))
v[0] = i;
if (orientation == right_handed)
{
v[1] = remaining_face[v[3]][v[0]];
v[2] = remaining_face[v[0]][v[3]];
}
else
{
v[1] = remaining_face[v[0]][v[3]];
v[2] = remaining_face[v[3]][v[0]];
}
/*
* Let z[i] be the location of v[i].
* The z[i] are known for i < 3, unknown for i == 3.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
z[i] = corner[v[i]];
/*
* Note the cross_ratio at the edge connecting v0 to v1.
*/
cross_ratio = cwl[edge3_between_faces[v[0]][v[1]]].rect;
if (orientation == left_handed)
cross_ratio = complex_conjugate(complex_div(One, cross_ratio));
/*
* The cross ratio is defined as
*
* (z3 - z1) (z2 - z0)
* cross_ratio = -----------------------
* (z2 - z1) (z3 - z0)
*
* Solve for z3.
*
* z1*(z2 - z0) - cross_ratio*z0*(z2 - z1)
* z3 = -----------------------------------------
* (z2 - z0) - cross_ratio*(z2 - z1)
*
* If z0 is infinite, this reduces to
*
* z3 = z1 + cross_ratio * (z2 - z1)
*
* which makes sense geometrically.
*/
if (complex_infinite(z[0]) == TRUE)
z[3] = complex_plus(
z[1],
complex_mult(
cross_ratio,
complex_minus(z[2], z[1])
)
);
else
{
diff20 = complex_minus(z[2], z[0]);
diff21 = complex_minus(z[2], z[1]);
numerator = complex_minus(
complex_mult(z[1], diff20),
complex_mult(
cross_ratio,
complex_mult(z[0], diff21)
)
);
denominator = complex_minus(
diff20,
complex_mult(cross_ratio, diff21)
);
z[3] = complex_div(numerator, denominator); /* will handle division by Zero correctly */
}
corner[missing_corner] = z[3];
}
static void initial_tetrahedron(
Triangulation *manifold,
Tetrahedron **initial_tet,
Boolean compute_corners,
Boolean centroid_at_origin)
{
VertexIndex v[4];
Complex z,
sqrt_z,
w[4];
Tetrahedron *tet;
EdgeIndex best_edge,
edge;
/*
* Set a default choice of tetrahedron and edge.
*/
*initial_tet = manifold->tet_list_begin.next;
best_edge = 0;
/*
* 2000/02/11 JRW Can we choose the initial tetrahedron in such
* a way that if we happen to have the canonical triangulation
* of a 2-bridge knot or link complement, the basepoint falls
* at a center of D2 symmetry? That is, can we find a Tetrahedron
* that looks like the "top of the tower" in the canonical
* triangulation of a 2-bridge knot or link complement?
*/
for (tet = manifold->tet_list_begin.next;
tet != &manifold->tet_list_end;
tet = tet->next)
for (edge = 0; edge < 6; edge++)
if (tet->neighbor[one_face_at_edge [edge]]
== tet->neighbor[other_face_at_edge[edge]])
{
*initial_tet = tet;
best_edge = edge;
}
if (compute_corners)
{
if (centroid_at_origin == TRUE)
{
/*
* Proposition. For any value of w, positioning the corners at
*
* corner[0] = w
* corner[1] = w^-1
* corner[2] = -w^-1
* corner[3] = -w
*
* defines a tetrahedron with its centroid at the "origin" and
* the common perpendiculars between pairs of opposite edges
* coincident with the "coordinate axes". [In the Klein model,
* the tetrahedron is inscribed in a rectangular box whose faces
* are parallel to the coordinate axes.]
*
* Proof: Use the observation that the line from a0 to a1 will
* intersect the line from b0 to b1 iff the cross ratio
*
* (b0 - a0) (b1 - a1)
* -------------------
* (b1 - a0) (b0 - a1)
*
* of the tetrahedron they span is real, and they will be
* orthogonal iff the cross ratio is -1.
*
* [-w, w] is orthogonal to [0, infinity] because
*
* (0 - -w) (infinity - w)
* ----------------------- = -1
* (infinity - -w) (0 - w)
*
* and similarly for [-w^-1, w^-1] and [0, infinity].
*
* [w^-1, w] is orthogonal to [-1, 1] because
*
* (-1 - w^-1) (1 - w)
* ------------------- = -1
* (1 - w^-1) (-1 - w)
*
* and similarly for [-w^-1, -w] and [-1, 1].
*
* [-w^-1, w] is orthogonal to [-i, i] because
*
* (-i - -w^-1) (i - w)
* -------------------- = -1
* (i - -w^-1) (-i - w)
*
* and similarly for [w^-1, -w] and [-i, i].
*
* Q.E.D.
*
*
* The tetrahedron will have the correct cross ratio z iff
*
* (w - -w^-1) (w^-1 - -w ) (w + w^-1)^2
* z = -------------------------- = --------------
* (w - -w ) (w^-1 - -w^-1) 4
*
* Solving for w in terms of z gives the four possibilities
*
* w = +- (sqrt(z) +- sqrt(z - 1))
*
* Note that sqrt(z) + sqrt(z - 1) and sqrt(z) - sqrt(z - 1) are
* inverses of one another. We can choose any of the four solutions
* to be "w", and the other three will automatically become w^-1,
* -w, and -w^-1.
*
* Comment: This position for the initial corners brings out
* nice numerical properties in the O(3,1) matrices for manifolds
* composed of regular ideal tetrahedra (cf. the proofs in the
* directory "Tilings of H^3", which aren't part of SnapPea, but
* I could give you a copy).
*/
z = (*initial_tet)->shape[filled]->cwl[ultimate][0].rect;
w[0] = complex_plus(
complex_sqrt(z),
complex_sqrt(complex_minus(z, One))
);
w[1] = complex_div(One, w[0]);
w[2] = complex_negate(w[1]);
w[3] = complex_negate(w[0]);
(*initial_tet)->corner[0] = w[0];
(*initial_tet)->corner[1] = w[1];
(*initial_tet)->corner[2] = w[2];
(*initial_tet)->corner[3] = w[3];
}
else
{
/*
* Originally this code positioned the Tetrahedron's vertices
* at {0, 1, z, infinity}. As of 2000/02/04 I modified it
* to put the vertices at {0, 1/sqrt(z), sqrt(z), infinity} instead,
* so that the basepoint (0,0,1) falls at the midpoint
* of the edge extending from 0 to infinity, and the
* tetrahedron's symmetry axis lies parallel to the x-axis.
* To convince yourself that the tetrahedron's axis of
* symmetry does indeed pass through that point, note
* that a half turn around the axis of symmetry factors
* as a reflection in the plane |z| = 1 followed by
* a reflection in the vertical plane sitting over x-axis.
*/
/*
* Order the vertices so that the tetrahedron is positively
* oriented, and the selected edge is between vertices
* v[0] and v[1].
*/
v[0] = one_vertex_at_edge[best_edge];
v[1] = other_vertex_at_edge[best_edge];
v[2] = remaining_face[v[1]][v[0]];
v[3] = remaining_face[v[0]][v[1]];
/*
* Set the coordinates of the corners.
*/
z = (*initial_tet)->shape[filled]->cwl[ultimate][edge3[best_edge]].rect;
sqrt_z = complex_sqrt(z);
(*initial_tet)->corner[v[0]] = Infinity;
(*initial_tet)->corner[v[1]] = Zero;
(*initial_tet)->corner[v[2]] = complex_div(One, sqrt_z);
(*initial_tet)->corner[v[3]] = sqrt_z;
}
}
}
// expect wavelength in m
int SetReflectivity(struct ElementType *ep, double wavelength)
{
double f1, f2, a, rho, energy, nt, delta, beta, ac, sinag, cosag, Rs, Rp;
int z, myreturn;
COMPLEX cn, cn2, cwu, crs, cts, crp, ctp, c1, c2, c3, csinag;
char *material;
struct ReflecType *rp;
material= ep->MDat.material;
rp= (struct ReflecType *)&ep->reflec;
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("debug: SetReflectivity called, material= >%s<, file= %s\n", material, __FILE__);
#endif
if (!(wavelength > 0.0))
{
fprintf(stderr, "error SetReflectivity: wavelength not defined (%f)- return");
return 0;
}
energy= 1240e-9/ wavelength;
myreturn= ReadMaterial(material, &z, &a, &rho);
myreturn &= ReadHenke(material, energy, &f1, &f2);
nt= 1e6* rho * NA / a; // Teilchendichte (1/m^3), rho is in (g/cm^3)
delta= RE * pow(wavelength, 2) * nt * f1 / (2.0 * PI);
beta = RE * pow(wavelength, 2) * nt * f2 / (2.0 * PI);
ac = acos(1.0 - delta); // critical (grazing) angle in rad
complex_in(&cn, (1.0- delta), beta); // complex index of refraction
sinag= ep->geo.cosa; // sin(grazing angle) grazing angle in rad
cosag= ep->geo.sina; // sin <-> cos change for grazing angle
// we calculate the compex reflectivity and transmission coefficients
// transmission coefficients not used so far
complex_x (&cn, &cn, &cn2); // n^2
complex_in (&c1, pow(cosag, 2.0), 0.0); // cos(theta))^2 saved in c1
complex_minus(&cn2, &c1, &c2); // c2= n2- c1
complex_pow (&c2, 0.5, &cwu); // wu= sqrt(c2)
complex_in (&csinag, sinag, 0.0); // sin(theta) saved in csinag
complex_minus(&csinag, &cwu, &c1); // zehler in c1
complex_plus (&csinag, &cwu, &c2); // nenner in c2
complex_div (&c1, &c2, &crs); // calc crs
complex_in (&c1, (2* sinag), 0.0); // zehler in c1
complex_div(&c1, &c2, &cts); // calc cts
complex_x (&cn2, &csinag, &c3); // c3
complex_minus(&c3, &cwu, &c1); // zehler in c1
complex_plus (&c3, &cwu, &c2); // nenner in c2
complex_div (&c1, &c2, &crp); // calc crp
complex_in (&c1, 2.0, 0.0); // 2.0 in c1
complex_x (&c1, &cn, &c3); // 2n in c3
complex_x (&c3, &csinag, &c1); // zaehler in c1
complex_div(&c1, &c2, &ctp); // calc ctp
Rs= pow(crs.re, 2)+ pow(crs.im, 2); // abs()^2
Rp= pow(crp.re, 2)+ pow(crp.im, 2); // abs()^2;
rp->runpol= 0.5 * (Rs + Rp);
// fill double ryamp, rypha, rzamp, rzpha, runpol;
switch (ep->GDat.azimut) /* vertikal 0; nach links 1; nach unten 2 ; nach rechts 3 */
{
case 0:
case 2:
rp->ryamp= sqrt(pow(crp.re, 2)+ pow(crp.im, 2));
rp->rypha= atan2(crp.im, crp.re);
rp->rzamp= sqrt(pow(crs.re, 2)+ pow(crs.im, 2));
rp->rzpha= atan2(crs.im, crs.re);
break;
case 1:
case 3:
rp->rzamp= sqrt(pow(crp.re, 2)+ pow(crp.im, 2));
rp->rzpha= atan2(crp.im, crp.re);
rp->ryamp= sqrt(pow(crs.re, 2)+ pow(crs.im, 2));
rp->rypha= atan2(crs.im, crs.re);
break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, "error in file %s- azimut >>%d<<out of range\n", __FILE__, ep->GDat.azimut);
exit(-1);
}
return myreturn;
} // SetReflectivity
