template <class T> void do_oop_work(T* p) {
oop obj = oopDesc::load_decode_heap_oop_not_null(p);
if (_young_gen->is_in_reserved(obj)) {
assert(_card_table->addr_is_marked_precise(p), "Found unmarked precise oop");
_card_table->set_card_newgen(p);
}
}
template <class T> void do_oop_work(T* p) {
oop obj = oopDesc::load_decode_heap_oop_not_null(p);
if (_young_gen->is_in_reserved(obj) &&
!_card_table->addr_is_marked_imprecise(p)) {
// Don't overwrite the first missing card mark
if (_unmarked_addr == NULL) {
_unmarked_addr = (HeapWord*)p;
_unmarked_card = _card_table->byte_for(p);
}
}
}
// Card marks are not precise. The current system can leave us with
// a mismash of precise marks and beginning of object marks. This means
// we test for missing precise marks first. If any are found, we don't
// fail unless the object head is also unmarked.
virtual void do_object(oop obj) {
CheckForUnmarkedOops object_check(_young_gen, _card_table);
obj->oop_iterate(&object_check);
if (object_check.has_unmarked_oop()) {
assert(_card_table->addr_is_marked_imprecise(obj), "Found unmarked young_gen object");
}
}