/// Build a new nested-name-specifier for "identifier::", as described
/// by ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
///
/// \param S Scope in which the nested-name-specifier occurs.
/// \param IdInfo Parser information about an identifier in the
/// nested-name-spec.
/// \param EnteringContext If true, enter the context specified by the
/// nested-name-specifier.
/// \param SS Optional nested name specifier preceding the identifier.
/// \param ScopeLookupResult Provides the result of name lookup within the
/// scope of the nested-name-specifier that was computed at template
/// definition time.
/// \param ErrorRecoveryLookup Specifies if the method is called to improve
/// error recovery and what kind of recovery is performed.
/// \param IsCorrectedToColon If not null, suggestion of replace '::' -> ':'
/// are allowed. The bool value pointed by this parameter is set to
/// 'true' if the identifier is treated as if it was followed by ':',
/// not '::'.
/// \param OnlyNamespace If true, only considers namespaces in lookup.
///
/// This routine differs only slightly from ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier, in
/// that it contains an extra parameter \p ScopeLookupResult, which provides
/// the result of name lookup within the scope of the nested-name-specifier
/// that was computed at template definition time.
///
/// If ErrorRecoveryLookup is true, then this call is used to improve error
/// recovery. This means that it should not emit diagnostics, it should
/// just return true on failure. It also means it should only return a valid
/// scope if it *knows* that the result is correct. It should not return in a
/// dependent context, for example. Nor will it extend \p SS with the scope
/// specifier.
bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, NestedNameSpecInfo &IdInfo,
bool EnteringContext, CXXScopeSpec &SS,
NamedDecl *ScopeLookupResult,
bool ErrorRecoveryLookup,
bool *IsCorrectedToColon,
bool OnlyNamespace) {
if (IdInfo.Identifier->isEditorPlaceholder())
return true;
LookupResult Found(*this, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
OnlyNamespace ? LookupNamespaceName
: LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
QualType ObjectType = GetTypeFromParser(IdInfo.ObjectType);
// Determine where to perform name lookup
DeclContext *LookupCtx = nullptr;
bool isDependent = false;
if (IsCorrectedToColon)
*IsCorrectedToColon = false;
if (!ObjectType.isNull()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression, e.g.,
// x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
isDependent = ObjectType->isDependentType();
} else if (SS.isSet()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs after another nested-name-specifier,
// so look into the context associated with the prior nested-name-specifier.
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
Found.setContextRange(SS.getRange());
}
bool ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = false;
if (LookupCtx) {
// Perform "qualified" name lookup into the declaration context we
// computed, which is either the type of the base of a member access
// expression or the declaration context associated with a prior
// nested-name-specifier.
// The declaration context must be complete.
if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() &&
RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx))
return true;
LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx);
if (!ObjectType.isNull() && Found.empty()) {
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
// If the id-expression in a class member access is a qualified-id of
// the form
//
// class-name-or-namespace-name::...
//
// the class-name-or-namespace-name following the . or -> operator is
// looked up both in the context of the entire postfix-expression and in
// the scope of the class of the object expression. If the name is found
// only in the scope of the class of the object expression, the name
// shall refer to a class-name. If the name is found only in the
// context of the entire postfix-expression, the name shall refer to a
// class-name or namespace-name. [...]
//
// Qualified name lookup into a class will not find a namespace-name,
// so we do not need to diagnose that case specifically. However,
// this qualified name lookup may find nothing. In that case, perform
// unqualified name lookup in the given scope (if available) or
// reconstruct the result from when name lookup was performed at template
// definition time.
if (S)
LookupName(Found, S);
else if (ScopeLookupResult)
Found.addDecl(ScopeLookupResult);
ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true;
}
} else if (!isDependent) {
// Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
LookupName(Found, S);
}
if (Found.isAmbiguous())
return true;
// If we performed lookup into a dependent context and did not find anything,
// that's fine: just build a dependent nested-name-specifier.
if (Found.empty() && isDependent &&
!(LookupCtx && LookupCtx->isRecord() &&
(!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasDefinition() ||
!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasAnyDependentBases()))) {
// Don't speculate if we're just trying to improve error recovery.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return true;
// We were not able to compute the declaration context for a dependent
// base object type or prior nested-name-specifier, so this
// nested-name-specifier refers to an unknown specialization. Just build
// a dependent nested-name-specifier.
SS.Extend(Context, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, IdInfo.CCLoc);
return false;
}
if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
// If identifier is not found as class-name-or-namespace-name, but is found
// as other entity, don't look for typos.
LookupResult R(*this, Found.getLookupNameInfo(), LookupOrdinaryName);
if (LookupCtx)
LookupQualifiedName(R, LookupCtx);
else if (S && !isDependent)
LookupName(R, S);
if (!R.empty()) {
// Don't diagnose problems with this speculative lookup.
R.suppressDiagnostics();
// The identifier is found in ordinary lookup. If correction to colon is
// allowed, suggest replacement to ':'.
if (IsCorrectedToColon) {
*IsCorrectedToColon = true;
Diag(IdInfo.CCLoc, diag::err_nested_name_spec_is_not_class)
<< IdInfo.Identifier << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(IdInfo.CCLoc, ":");
if (NamedDecl *ND = R.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_declared_at);
return true;
}
// Replacement '::' -> ':' is not allowed, just issue respective error.
Diag(R.getNameLoc(), OnlyNamespace
? unsigned(diag::err_expected_namespace_name)
: unsigned(diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace))
<< IdInfo.Identifier << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus;
if (NamedDecl *ND = R.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_entity_declared_at)
<< IdInfo.Identifier;
return true;
}
}
if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup && !getLangOpts().MSVCCompat) {
// We haven't found anything, and we're not recovering from a
// different kind of error, so look for typos.
DeclarationName Name = Found.getLookupName();
Found.clear();
NestedNameSpecifierValidatorCCC CCC(*this);
if (TypoCorrection Corrected = CorrectTypo(
Found.getLookupNameInfo(), Found.getLookupKind(), S, &SS, CCC,
CTK_ErrorRecovery, LookupCtx, EnteringContext)) {
if (LookupCtx) {
bool DroppedSpecifier =
Corrected.WillReplaceSpecifier() &&
Name.getAsString() == Corrected.getAsString(getLangOpts());
if (DroppedSpecifier)
SS.clear();
diagnoseTypo(Corrected, PDiag(diag::err_no_member_suggest)
<< Name << LookupCtx << DroppedSpecifier
<< SS.getRange());
} else
diagnoseTypo(Corrected, PDiag(diag::err_undeclared_var_use_suggest)
<< Name);
if (Corrected.getCorrectionSpecifier())
SS.MakeTrivial(Context, Corrected.getCorrectionSpecifier(),
SourceRange(Found.getNameLoc()));
if (NamedDecl *ND = Corrected.getFoundDecl())
Found.addDecl(ND);
Found.setLookupName(Corrected.getCorrection());
} else {
Found.setLookupName(IdInfo.Identifier);
}
}
NamedDecl *SD =
Found.isSingleResult() ? Found.getRepresentativeDecl() : nullptr;
bool IsExtension = false;
bool AcceptSpec = isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD, &IsExtension);
if (!AcceptSpec && IsExtension) {
AcceptSpec = true;
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::ext_nested_name_spec_is_enum);
}
if (AcceptSpec) {
if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope &&
!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) {
// C++03 [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
// [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the
// class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity.
//
// We already found the name in the scope of the object. Now, look
// into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to
// see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no
// scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself.
//
// Note that C++11 does *not* perform this redundant lookup.
NamedDecl *OuterDecl;
if (S) {
LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
LookupName(FoundOuter, S);
OuterDecl = FoundOuter.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
} else
OuterDecl = ScopeLookupResult;
if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(OuterDecl) &&
OuterDecl->getCanonicalDecl() != SD->getCanonicalDecl() &&
(!isa<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl) || !isa<TypeDecl>(SD) ||
!Context.hasSameType(
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl)),
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD))))) {
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return true;
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
<< IdInfo.Identifier;
Diag(SD->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_object_type)
<< ObjectType;
Diag(OuterDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_scope);
// Fall through so that we'll pick the name we found in the object
// type, since that's probably what the user wanted anyway.
}
}
if (auto *TD = dyn_cast_or_null<TypedefNameDecl>(SD))
MarkAnyDeclReferenced(TD->getLocation(), TD, /*OdrUse=*/false);
// If we're just performing this lookup for error-recovery purposes,
// don't extend the nested-name-specifier. Just return now.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return false;
// The use of a nested name specifier may trigger deprecation warnings.
DiagnoseUseOfDecl(SD, IdInfo.CCLoc);
if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD)) {
SS.Extend(Context, Namespace, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, IdInfo.CCLoc);
return false;
}
if (NamespaceAliasDecl *Alias = dyn_cast<NamespaceAliasDecl>(SD)) {
SS.Extend(Context, Alias, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, IdInfo.CCLoc);
return false;
}
QualType T =
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD->getUnderlyingDecl()));
TypeLocBuilder TLB;
if (isa<InjectedClassNameType>(T)) {
InjectedClassNameTypeLoc InjectedTL
= TLB.push<InjectedClassNameTypeLoc>(T);
InjectedTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<RecordType>(T)) {
RecordTypeLoc RecordTL = TLB.push<RecordTypeLoc>(T);
RecordTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<TypedefType>(T)) {
TypedefTypeLoc TypedefTL = TLB.push<TypedefTypeLoc>(T);
TypedefTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<EnumType>(T)) {
EnumTypeLoc EnumTL = TLB.push<EnumTypeLoc>(T);
EnumTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<TemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TemplateTypeTL
= TLB.push<TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
TemplateTypeTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<UnresolvedUsingType>(T)) {
UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc UnresolvedTL
= TLB.push<UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc>(T);
UnresolvedTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TL
= TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
TL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType>(T)) {
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc TL
= TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc>(T);
TL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
} else {
llvm_unreachable("Unhandled TypeDecl node in nested-name-specifier");
}
if (T->isEnumeralType())
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_enum_nested_name_spec);
SS.Extend(Context, SourceLocation(), TLB.getTypeLocInContext(Context, T),
IdInfo.CCLoc);
return false;
}
// Otherwise, we have an error case. If we don't want diagnostics, just
// return an error now.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return true;
// If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with
// ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error
// messages.
if (Found.empty()) {
Found.clear(LookupOrdinaryName);
LookupName(Found, S);
}
// In Microsoft mode, if we are within a templated function and we can't
// resolve Identifier, then extend the SS with Identifier. This will have
// the effect of resolving Identifier during template instantiation.
// The goal is to be able to resolve a function call whose
// nested-name-specifier is located inside a dependent base class.
// Example:
//
// class C {
// public:
// static void foo2() { }
// };
// template <class T> class A { public: typedef C D; };
//
// template <class T> class B : public A<T> {
// public:
// void foo() { D::foo2(); }
// };
if (getLangOpts().MSVCCompat) {
DeclContext *DC = LookupCtx ? LookupCtx : CurContext;
if (DC->isDependentContext() && DC->isFunctionOrMethod()) {
CXXRecordDecl *ContainingClass = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC->getParent());
if (ContainingClass && ContainingClass->hasAnyDependentBases()) {
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
diag::ext_undeclared_unqual_id_with_dependent_base)
<< IdInfo.Identifier << ContainingClass;
SS.Extend(Context, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
IdInfo.CCLoc);
return false;
}
}
}
if (!Found.empty()) {
if (TypeDecl *TD = Found.getAsSingle<TypeDecl>())
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace)
<< Context.getTypeDeclType(TD) << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus;
else {
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace)
<< IdInfo.Identifier << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus;
if (NamedDecl *ND = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_entity_declared_at)
<< IdInfo.Identifier;
}
} else if (SS.isSet())
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_no_member) << IdInfo.Identifier
<< LookupCtx << SS.getRange();
else
Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_undeclared_var_use)
<< IdInfo.Identifier;
return true;
}
/// \brief Build a new nested-name-specifier for "identifier::", as described
/// by ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
///
/// This routine differs only slightly from ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier, in
/// that it contains an extra parameter \p ScopeLookupResult, which provides
/// the result of name lookup within the scope of the nested-name-specifier
/// that was computed at template definition time.
///
/// If ErrorRecoveryLookup is true, then this call is used to improve error
/// recovery. This means that it should not emit diagnostics, it should
/// just return true on failure. It also means it should only return a valid
/// scope if it *knows* that the result is correct. It should not return in a
/// dependent context, for example. Nor will it extend \p SS with the scope
/// specifier.
bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
IdentifierInfo &Identifier,
SourceLocation IdentifierLoc,
SourceLocation CCLoc,
QualType ObjectType,
bool EnteringContext,
CXXScopeSpec &SS,
NamedDecl *ScopeLookupResult,
bool ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
LookupResult Found(*this, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc,
LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
// Determine where to perform name lookup
DeclContext *LookupCtx = 0;
bool isDependent = false;
if (!ObjectType.isNull()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression, e.g.,
// x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
isDependent = ObjectType->isDependentType();
} else if (SS.isSet()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs after another nested-name-specifier,
// so look into the context associated with the prior nested-name-specifier.
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
Found.setContextRange(SS.getRange());
}
bool ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = false;
if (LookupCtx) {
// Perform "qualified" name lookup into the declaration context we
// computed, which is either the type of the base of a member access
// expression or the declaration context associated with a prior
// nested-name-specifier.
// The declaration context must be complete.
if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() &&
RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx))
return true;
LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx);
if (!ObjectType.isNull() && Found.empty()) {
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
// If the id-expression in a class member access is a qualified-id of
// the form
//
// class-name-or-namespace-name::...
//
// the class-name-or-namespace-name following the . or -> operator is
// looked up both in the context of the entire postfix-expression and in
// the scope of the class of the object expression. If the name is found
// only in the scope of the class of the object expression, the name
// shall refer to a class-name. If the name is found only in the
// context of the entire postfix-expression, the name shall refer to a
// class-name or namespace-name. [...]
//
// Qualified name lookup into a class will not find a namespace-name,
// so we do not need to diagnose that case specifically. However,
// this qualified name lookup may find nothing. In that case, perform
// unqualified name lookup in the given scope (if available) or
// reconstruct the result from when name lookup was performed at template
// definition time.
if (S)
LookupName(Found, S);
else if (ScopeLookupResult)
Found.addDecl(ScopeLookupResult);
ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true;
}
} else if (!isDependent) {
// Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
LookupName(Found, S);
}
// If we performed lookup into a dependent context and did not find anything,
// that's fine: just build a dependent nested-name-specifier.
if (Found.empty() && isDependent &&
!(LookupCtx && LookupCtx->isRecord() &&
(!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasDefinition() ||
!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasAnyDependentBases()))) {
// Don't speculate if we're just trying to improve error recovery.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return true;
// We were not able to compute the declaration context for a dependent
// base object type or prior nested-name-specifier, so this
// nested-name-specifier refers to an unknown specialization. Just build
// a dependent nested-name-specifier.
SS.Extend(Context, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
return false;
}
// FIXME: Deal with ambiguities cleanly.
if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
// We haven't found anything, and we're not recovering from a
// different kind of error, so look for typos.
DeclarationName Name = Found.getLookupName();
TypoCorrection Corrected;
Found.clear();
if ((Corrected = CorrectTypo(Found.getLookupNameInfo(),
Found.getLookupKind(), S, &SS, LookupCtx,
EnteringContext, CTC_NoKeywords)) &&
isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(Corrected.getCorrectionDecl())) {
std::string CorrectedStr(Corrected.getAsString(getLangOptions()));
std::string CorrectedQuotedStr(Corrected.getQuoted(getLangOptions()));
if (LookupCtx)
Diag(Found.getNameLoc(), diag::err_no_member_suggest)
<< Name << LookupCtx << CorrectedQuotedStr << SS.getRange()
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Found.getNameLoc(), CorrectedStr);
else
Diag(Found.getNameLoc(), diag::err_undeclared_var_use_suggest)
<< Name << CorrectedQuotedStr
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Found.getNameLoc(), CorrectedStr);
if (NamedDecl *ND = Corrected.getCorrectionDecl()) {
Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl) << CorrectedQuotedStr;
Found.addDecl(ND);
}
Found.setLookupName(Corrected.getCorrection());
} else {
Found.setLookupName(&Identifier);
}
}
NamedDecl *SD = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD)) {
if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) {
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
// [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the
// class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity.
//
// We already found the name in the scope of the object. Now, look
// into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to
// see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no
// scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself.
NamedDecl *OuterDecl;
if (S) {
LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc,
LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
LookupName(FoundOuter, S);
OuterDecl = FoundOuter.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
} else
OuterDecl = ScopeLookupResult;
if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(OuterDecl) &&
OuterDecl->getCanonicalDecl() != SD->getCanonicalDecl() &&
(!isa<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl) || !isa<TypeDecl>(SD) ||
!Context.hasSameType(
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl)),
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD))))) {
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return true;
Diag(IdentifierLoc,
diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
<< &Identifier;
Diag(SD->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_object_type)
<< ObjectType;
Diag(OuterDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_scope);
// Fall through so that we'll pick the name we found in the object
// type, since that's probably what the user wanted anyway.
}
}
// If we're just performing this lookup for error-recovery purposes,
// don't extend the nested-name-specifier. Just return now.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return false;
if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD)) {
SS.Extend(Context, Namespace, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
return false;
}
if (NamespaceAliasDecl *Alias = dyn_cast<NamespaceAliasDecl>(SD)) {
SS.Extend(Context, Alias, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
return false;
}
QualType T = Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD));
TypeLocBuilder TLB;
if (isa<InjectedClassNameType>(T)) {
InjectedClassNameTypeLoc InjectedTL
= TLB.push<InjectedClassNameTypeLoc>(T);
InjectedTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<RecordType>(T)) {
RecordTypeLoc RecordTL = TLB.push<RecordTypeLoc>(T);
RecordTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<TypedefType>(T)) {
TypedefTypeLoc TypedefTL = TLB.push<TypedefTypeLoc>(T);
TypedefTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<EnumType>(T)) {
EnumTypeLoc EnumTL = TLB.push<EnumTypeLoc>(T);
EnumTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<TemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TemplateTypeTL
= TLB.push<TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
TemplateTypeTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<UnresolvedUsingType>(T)) {
UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc UnresolvedTL
= TLB.push<UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc>(T);
UnresolvedTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TL
= TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
TL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType>(T)) {
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc TL
= TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc>(T);
TL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
} else {
llvm_unreachable("Unhandled TypeDecl node in nested-name-specifier");
}
if (T->isEnumeralType())
Diag(IdentifierLoc, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_enum_nested_name_spec);
SS.Extend(Context, SourceLocation(), TLB.getTypeLocInContext(Context, T),
CCLoc);
return false;
}
// Otherwise, we have an error case. If we don't want diagnostics, just
// return an error now.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return true;
// If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with
// ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error
// messages.
if (Found.empty()) {
Found.clear(LookupOrdinaryName);
LookupName(Found, S);
}
// In Microsoft mode, if we are within a templated function and we can't
// resolve Identifier, then extend the SS with Identifier. This will have
// the effect of resolving Identifier during template instantiation.
// The goal is to be able to resolve a function call whose
// nested-name-specifier is located inside a dependent base class.
// Example:
//
// class C {
// public:
// static void foo2() { }
// };
// template <class T> class A { public: typedef C D; };
//
// template <class T> class B : public A<T> {
// public:
// void foo() { D::foo2(); }
// };
if (getLangOptions().MicrosoftExt) {
DeclContext *DC = LookupCtx ? LookupCtx : CurContext;
if (DC->isDependentContext() && DC->isFunctionOrMethod()) {
SS.Extend(Context, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
return false;
}
}
unsigned DiagID;
if (!Found.empty())
DiagID = diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace;
else if (SS.isSet()) {
Diag(IdentifierLoc, diag::err_no_member)
<< &Identifier << LookupCtx << SS.getRange();
return true;
} else
DiagID = diag::err_undeclared_var_use;
if (SS.isSet())
Diag(IdentifierLoc, DiagID) << &Identifier << SS.getRange();
else
Diag(IdentifierLoc, DiagID) << &Identifier;
return true;
}
/// \brief Build a new nested-name-specifier for "identifier::", as described
/// by ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
///
/// This routine differs only slightly from ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier, in
/// that it contains an extra parameter \p ScopeLookupResult, which provides
/// the result of name lookup within the scope of the nested-name-specifier
/// that was computed at template definition time.
///
/// If ErrorRecoveryLookup is true, then this call is used to improve error
/// recovery. This means that it should not emit diagnostics, it should
/// just return null on failure. It also means it should only return a valid
/// scope if it *knows* that the result is correct. It should not return in a
/// dependent context, for example.
Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
SourceLocation IdLoc,
SourceLocation CCLoc,
IdentifierInfo &II,
QualType ObjectType,
NamedDecl *ScopeLookupResult,
bool EnteringContext,
bool ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
NestedNameSpecifier *Prefix
= static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(SS.getScopeRep());
LookupResult Found(*this, &II, IdLoc, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
// Determine where to perform name lookup
DeclContext *LookupCtx = 0;
bool isDependent = false;
if (!ObjectType.isNull()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression, e.g.,
// x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
isDependent = ObjectType->isDependentType();
} else if (SS.isSet()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs after another nested-name-specifier,
// so long into the context associated with the prior nested-name-specifier.
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
Found.setContextRange(SS.getRange());
}
bool ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = false;
if (LookupCtx) {
// Perform "qualified" name lookup into the declaration context we
// computed, which is either the type of the base of a member access
// expression or the declaration context associated with a prior
// nested-name-specifier.
// The declaration context must be complete.
if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() && RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS))
return 0;
LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx);
if (!ObjectType.isNull() && Found.empty()) {
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
// If the id-expression in a class member access is a qualified-id of
// the form
//
// class-name-or-namespace-name::...
//
// the class-name-or-namespace-name following the . or -> operator is
// looked up both in the context of the entire postfix-expression and in
// the scope of the class of the object expression. If the name is found
// only in the scope of the class of the object expression, the name
// shall refer to a class-name. If the name is found only in the
// context of the entire postfix-expression, the name shall refer to a
// class-name or namespace-name. [...]
//
// Qualified name lookup into a class will not find a namespace-name,
// so we do not need to diagnoste that case specifically. However,
// this qualified name lookup may find nothing. In that case, perform
// unqualified name lookup in the given scope (if available) or
// reconstruct the result from when name lookup was performed at template
// definition time.
if (S)
LookupName(Found, S);
else if (ScopeLookupResult)
Found.addDecl(ScopeLookupResult);
ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true;
}
} else if (isDependent) {
// Don't speculate if we're just trying to improve error recovery.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return 0;
// We were not able to compute the declaration context for a dependent
// base object type or prior nested-name-specifier, so this
// nested-name-specifier refers to an unknown specialization. Just build
// a dependent nested-name-specifier.
if (!Prefix)
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, &II);
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, &II);
} else {
// Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
LookupName(Found, S);
}
// FIXME: Deal with ambiguities cleanly.
if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
// We haven't found anything, and we're not recovering from a
// different kind of error, so look for typos.
DeclarationName Name = Found.getLookupName();
if (CorrectTypo(Found, S, &SS, LookupCtx, EnteringContext) &&
Found.isSingleResult() &&
isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())) {
if (LookupCtx)
Diag(Found.getNameLoc(), diag::err_no_member_suggest)
<< Name << LookupCtx << Found.getLookupName() << SS.getRange()
<< CodeModificationHint::CreateReplacement(Found.getNameLoc(),
Found.getLookupName().getAsString());
else
Diag(Found.getNameLoc(), diag::err_undeclared_var_use_suggest)
<< Name << Found.getLookupName()
<< CodeModificationHint::CreateReplacement(Found.getNameLoc(),
Found.getLookupName().getAsString());
if (NamedDecl *ND = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl)
<< ND->getDeclName();
} else
Found.clear();
}
NamedDecl *SD = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD)) {
if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) {
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
// [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the
// class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity.
//
// We already found the name in the scope of the object. Now, look
// into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to
// see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no
// scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself.
NamedDecl *OuterDecl;
if (S) {
LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, &II, IdLoc, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
LookupName(FoundOuter, S);
OuterDecl = FoundOuter.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
} else
OuterDecl = ScopeLookupResult;
if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(OuterDecl) &&
OuterDecl->getCanonicalDecl() != SD->getCanonicalDecl() &&
(!isa<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl) || !isa<TypeDecl>(SD) ||
!Context.hasSameType(
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl)),
Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD))))) {
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return 0;
Diag(IdLoc, diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
<< &II;
Diag(SD->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_object_type)
<< ObjectType;
Diag(OuterDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_scope);
// Fall through so that we'll pick the name we found in the object
// type, since that's probably what the user wanted anyway.
}
}
if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD))
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, Namespace);
// FIXME: It would be nice to maintain the namespace alias name, then
// see through that alias when resolving the nested-name-specifier down to
// a declaration context.
if (NamespaceAliasDecl *Alias = dyn_cast<NamespaceAliasDecl>(SD))
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix,
Alias->getNamespace());
QualType T = Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD));
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, false,
T.getTypePtr());
}
// Otherwise, we have an error case. If we don't want diagnostics, just
// return an error now.
if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
return 0;
// If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with
// ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error
// messages.
if (Found.empty()) {
Found.clear(LookupOrdinaryName);
LookupName(Found, S);
}
unsigned DiagID;
if (!Found.empty())
DiagID = diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace;
else if (SS.isSet()) {
Diag(IdLoc, diag::err_no_member) << &II << LookupCtx << SS.getRange();
return 0;
} else
DiagID = diag::err_undeclared_var_use;
if (SS.isSet())
Diag(IdLoc, DiagID) << &II << SS.getRange();
else
Diag(IdLoc, DiagID) << &II;
return 0;
}