bool ParseData::parse(StringBuilder& sb)
{
if( sb.size() < 107 )
return false;
phi = (short)sb.parseInt(5,4);
psi = (short)sb.parseInt(10,4);
ASSERT(
180 >= phi &&
-180 <= phi &&
180 >= psi &&
-180 <= psi,
ParseException, "Phi/Psi range error");
rotID.setTo(sb, 24, 7 );
rotID.removeAll(' ');
ASSERT(rotID.size() == 4, ParseException, "RotID is bad");
probability = (float)sb.parseDouble(33, 8);
float chi;
chis.clear();
chi = (float)sb.parseDouble( 42, 7 );
if( chi != 0.0 ) // As a coder, this line makes me vomit, but unfortunatly their library is written this way. Eugh!
chis.push_back(chi);
chi = (float)sb.parseDouble( 50, 7 );
if( chi != 0.0 ) // Why could they not have a gap, or at least use NULL or something ?!?
chis.push_back(chi);
chi = (float)sb.parseDouble( 58, 7 );
if( chi != 0.0 )
chis.push_back(chi);
chi = (float)sb.parseDouble( 66, 7 );
if( chi != 0.0 )
chis.push_back(chi);
return true;
}
