double
mpfr_get_d_2exp (long *expptr, mpfr_srcptr src, mpfr_rnd_t rnd_mode)
{
double ret;
mpfr_exp_t exp;
mpfr_t tmp;
if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (MPFR_IS_SINGULAR (src)))
{
int negative;
*expptr = 0;
if (MPFR_IS_NAN (src))
return MPFR_DBL_NAN;
negative = MPFR_IS_NEG (src);
if (MPFR_IS_INF (src))
return negative ? MPFR_DBL_INFM : MPFR_DBL_INFP;
MPFR_ASSERTD (MPFR_IS_ZERO(src));
return negative ? DBL_NEG_ZERO : 0.0;
}
MPFR_ALIAS (tmp, src, MPFR_SIGN (src), 0);
ret = mpfr_get_d (tmp, rnd_mode);
if (MPFR_IS_PURE_FP(src))
{
exp = MPFR_GET_EXP (src);
/* rounding can give 1.0, adjust back to 0.5 <= abs(ret) < 1.0 */
if (ret == 1.0)
{
ret = 0.5;
exp++;
}
else if (ret == -1.0)
{
ret = -0.5;
exp++;
}
MPFR_ASSERTN ((ret >= 0.5 && ret < 1.0)
|| (ret <= -0.5 && ret > -1.0));
MPFR_ASSERTN (exp >= LONG_MIN && exp <= LONG_MAX);
}
else
exp = 0;
*expptr = exp;
return ret;
}
/* Assumes that the exponent range has already been extended and if y is
an integer, then the result is not exact in unbounded exponent range. */
int
mpfr_pow_general (mpfr_ptr z, mpfr_srcptr x, mpfr_srcptr y,
mpfr_rnd_t rnd_mode, int y_is_integer, mpfr_save_expo_t *expo)
{
mpfr_t t, u, k, absx;
int neg_result = 0;
int k_non_zero = 0;
int check_exact_case = 0;
int inexact;
/* Declaration of the size variable */
mpfr_prec_t Nz = MPFR_PREC(z); /* target precision */
mpfr_prec_t Nt; /* working precision */
mpfr_exp_t err; /* error */
MPFR_ZIV_DECL (ziv_loop);
MPFR_LOG_FUNC
(("x[%Pu]=%.*Rg y[%Pu]=%.*Rg rnd=%d",
mpfr_get_prec (x), mpfr_log_prec, x,
mpfr_get_prec (y), mpfr_log_prec, y, rnd_mode),
("z[%Pu]=%.*Rg inexact=%d",
mpfr_get_prec (z), mpfr_log_prec, z, inexact));
/* We put the absolute value of x in absx, pointing to the significand
of x to avoid allocating memory for the significand of absx. */
MPFR_ALIAS(absx, x, /*sign=*/ 1, /*EXP=*/ MPFR_EXP(x));
/* We will compute the absolute value of the result. So, let's
invert the rounding mode if the result is negative. */
if (MPFR_IS_NEG (x) && is_odd (y))
{
neg_result = 1;
rnd_mode = MPFR_INVERT_RND (rnd_mode);
}
/* compute the precision of intermediary variable */
/* the optimal number of bits : see algorithms.tex */
Nt = Nz + 5 + MPFR_INT_CEIL_LOG2 (Nz);
/* initialise of intermediary variable */
mpfr_init2 (t, Nt);
MPFR_ZIV_INIT (ziv_loop, Nt);
for (;;)
{
MPFR_BLOCK_DECL (flags1);
/* compute exp(y*ln|x|), using MPFR_RNDU to get an upper bound, so
that we can detect underflows. */
mpfr_log (t, absx, MPFR_IS_NEG (y) ? MPFR_RNDD : MPFR_RNDU); /* ln|x| */
mpfr_mul (t, y, t, MPFR_RNDU); /* y*ln|x| */
if (k_non_zero)
{
MPFR_LOG_MSG (("subtract k * ln(2)\n", 0));
mpfr_const_log2 (u, MPFR_RNDD);
mpfr_mul (u, u, k, MPFR_RNDD);
/* Error on u = k * log(2): < k * 2^(-Nt) < 1. */
mpfr_sub (t, t, u, MPFR_RNDU);
MPFR_LOG_MSG (("t = y * ln|x| - k * ln(2)\n", 0));
MPFR_LOG_VAR (t);
}
/* estimate of the error -- see pow function in algorithms.tex.
The error on t is at most 1/2 + 3*2^(EXP(t)+1) ulps, which is
<= 2^(EXP(t)+3) for EXP(t) >= -1, and <= 2 ulps for EXP(t) <= -2.
Additional error if k_no_zero: treal = t * errk, with
1 - |k| * 2^(-Nt) <= exp(-|k| * 2^(-Nt)) <= errk <= 1,
i.e., additional absolute error <= 2^(EXP(k)+EXP(t)-Nt).
Total error <= 2^err1 + 2^err2 <= 2^(max(err1,err2)+1). */
err = MPFR_NOTZERO (t) && MPFR_GET_EXP (t) >= -1 ?
MPFR_GET_EXP (t) + 3 : 1;
if (k_non_zero)
{
if (MPFR_GET_EXP (k) > err)
err = MPFR_GET_EXP (k);
err++;
}
MPFR_BLOCK (flags1, mpfr_exp (t, t, MPFR_RNDN)); /* exp(y*ln|x|)*/
/* We need to test */
if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (MPFR_IS_SINGULAR (t) || MPFR_UNDERFLOW (flags1)))
{
mpfr_prec_t Ntmin;
MPFR_BLOCK_DECL (flags2);
MPFR_ASSERTN (!k_non_zero);
MPFR_ASSERTN (!MPFR_IS_NAN (t));
/* Real underflow? */
if (MPFR_IS_ZERO (t))
{
/* Underflow. We computed rndn(exp(t)), where t >= y*ln|x|.
Therefore rndn(|x|^y) = 0, and we have a real underflow on
|x|^y. */
inexact = mpfr_underflow (z, rnd_mode == MPFR_RNDN ? MPFR_RNDZ
: rnd_mode, MPFR_SIGN_POS);
if (expo != NULL)
MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_UPDATE_FLAGS (*expo, MPFR_FLAGS_INEXACT
| MPFR_FLAGS_UNDERFLOW);
break;
}
/* Real overflow? */
if (MPFR_IS_INF (t))
{
/* Note: we can probably use a low precision for this test. */
mpfr_log (t, absx, MPFR_IS_NEG (y) ? MPFR_RNDU : MPFR_RNDD);
mpfr_mul (t, y, t, MPFR_RNDD); /* y * ln|x| */
MPFR_BLOCK (flags2, mpfr_exp (t, t, MPFR_RNDD));
/* t = lower bound on exp(y * ln|x|) */
if (MPFR_OVERFLOW (flags2))
{
/* We have computed a lower bound on |x|^y, and it
overflowed. Therefore we have a real overflow
on |x|^y. */
inexact = mpfr_overflow (z, rnd_mode, MPFR_SIGN_POS);
if (expo != NULL)
MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_UPDATE_FLAGS (*expo, MPFR_FLAGS_INEXACT
| MPFR_FLAGS_OVERFLOW);
break;
}
}
k_non_zero = 1;
Ntmin = sizeof(mpfr_exp_t) * CHAR_BIT;
if (Ntmin > Nt)
{
Nt = Ntmin;
mpfr_set_prec (t, Nt);
}
mpfr_init2 (u, Nt);
mpfr_init2 (k, Ntmin);
mpfr_log2 (k, absx, MPFR_RNDN);
mpfr_mul (k, y, k, MPFR_RNDN);
mpfr_round (k, k);
MPFR_LOG_VAR (k);
/* |y| < 2^Ntmin, therefore |k| < 2^Nt. */
continue;
}
if (MPFR_LIKELY (MPFR_CAN_ROUND (t, Nt - err, Nz, rnd_mode)))
{
inexact = mpfr_set (z, t, rnd_mode);
break;
}
/* check exact power, except when y is an integer (since the
exact cases for y integer have already been filtered out) */
if (check_exact_case == 0 && ! y_is_integer)
{
if (mpfr_pow_is_exact (z, absx, y, rnd_mode, &inexact))
break;
check_exact_case = 1;
}
/* reactualisation of the precision */
MPFR_ZIV_NEXT (ziv_loop, Nt);
mpfr_set_prec (t, Nt);
if (k_non_zero)
mpfr_set_prec (u, Nt);
}
MPFR_ZIV_FREE (ziv_loop);
if (k_non_zero)
{
int inex2;
long lk;
/* The rounded result in an unbounded exponent range is z * 2^k. As
* MPFR chooses underflow after rounding, the mpfr_mul_2si below will
* correctly detect underflows and overflows. However, in rounding to
* nearest, if z * 2^k = 2^(emin - 2), then the double rounding may
* affect the result. We need to cope with that before overwriting z.
* This can occur only if k < 0 (this test is necessary to avoid a
* potential integer overflow).
* If inexact >= 0, then the real result is <= 2^(emin - 2), so that
* o(2^(emin - 2)) = +0 is correct. If inexact < 0, then the real
* result is > 2^(emin - 2) and we need to round to 2^(emin - 1).
*/
MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_EXP_MAX <= LONG_MAX);
lk = mpfr_get_si (k, MPFR_RNDN);
/* Due to early overflow detection, |k| should not be much larger than
* MPFR_EMAX_MAX, and as MPFR_EMAX_MAX <= MPFR_EXP_MAX/2 <= LONG_MAX/2,
* an overflow should not be possible in mpfr_get_si (and lk is exact).
* And one even has the following assertion. TODO: complete proof.
*/
MPFR_ASSERTD (lk > LONG_MIN && lk < LONG_MAX);
/* Note: even in case of overflow (lk inexact), the code is correct.
* Indeed, for the 3 occurrences of lk:
* - The test lk < 0 is correct as sign(lk) = sign(k).
* - In the test MPFR_GET_EXP (z) == __gmpfr_emin - 1 - lk,
* if lk is inexact, then lk = LONG_MIN <= MPFR_EXP_MIN
* (the minimum value of the mpfr_exp_t type), and
* __gmpfr_emin - 1 - lk >= MPFR_EMIN_MIN - 1 - 2 * MPFR_EMIN_MIN
* >= - MPFR_EMIN_MIN - 1 = MPFR_EMAX_MAX - 1. However, from the
* choice of k, z has been chosen to be around 1, so that the
* result of the test is false, as if lk were exact.
* - In the mpfr_mul_2si (z, z, lk, rnd_mode), if lk is inexact,
* then |lk| >= LONG_MAX >= MPFR_EXP_MAX, and as z is around 1,
* mpfr_mul_2si underflows or overflows in the same way as if
* lk were exact.
* TODO: give a bound on |t|, then on |EXP(z)|.
*/
if (rnd_mode == MPFR_RNDN && inexact < 0 && lk < 0 &&
MPFR_GET_EXP (z) == __gmpfr_emin - 1 - lk && mpfr_powerof2_raw (z))
{
/* Rounding to nearest, real result > z * 2^k = 2^(emin - 2),
* underflow case: as the minimum precision is > 1, we will
* obtain the correct result and exceptions by replacing z by
* nextabove(z).
*/
MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_PREC_MIN > 1);
mpfr_nextabove (z);
}
MPFR_CLEAR_FLAGS ();
inex2 = mpfr_mul_2si (z, z, lk, rnd_mode);
if (inex2) /* underflow or overflow */
{
inexact = inex2;
if (expo != NULL)
MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_UPDATE_FLAGS (*expo, __gmpfr_flags);
}
mpfr_clears (u, k, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
}
mpfr_clear (t);
/* update the sign of the result if x was negative */
if (neg_result)
{
MPFR_SET_NEG(z);
inexact = -inexact;
}
return inexact;
}