void LLIMSpeakerMgr::moderateVoiceAllParticipants( bool unmute_everyone )
{
if (mVoiceModerated == !unmute_everyone)
{
// session already in requested state. Just force participants which do not match it.
forceVoiceModeratedMode(mVoiceModerated);
}
else
{
// otherwise set moderated mode for a whole session.
moderateVoiceSession(getSessionID(), !unmute_everyone);
}
}
void LLIMSpeakerMgr::moderateVoiceOtherParticipants(const LLUUID& excluded_avatar_id, bool unmute_everyone_else)
{
// *TODO: mantipov: add more intellectual processing of several following requests if it is needed.
/*
Such situation should be tested:
"Moderator sends the same second request before first response is come"
Moderator sends "mute everyone else" for A and then for B
two requests to disallow voice chat are sent
UUID of B is stored.
Then first response (to disallow voice chat) is come
request to allow voice for stored avatar (B)
Then second response (to disallow voice chat) is come
have nothing to do, the latest selected speaker is already enabled
What can happen?
If request to allow voice for stored avatar (B) is processed on server BEFORE
second request to disallow voice chat all speakers will be disabled on voice.
But I'm not sure such situation is possible.
See EXT-3431.
*/
mReverseVoiceModeratedAvatarID = excluded_avatar_id;
moderateVoiceSession(getSessionID(), !unmute_everyone_else);
}
