/**************************** wrapper functions ***************************/
static int t_check_status(struct sip_msg* msg, char *regexp, char *foo)
{
regmatch_t pmatch;
struct cell *t;
char *status;
char backup;
int lowest_status;
int n;
/* first get the transaction */
if (t_check( msg , 0 )==-1) return -1;
if ( (t=get_t())==0) {
LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: t_check_status: cannot check status for a reply "
"which has no T-state established\n");
return -1;
}
backup = 0;
switch (route_type) {
case REQUEST_ROUTE:
/* use the status of the last sent reply */
status = int2str( t->uas.status, 0);
break;
case ONREPLY_ROUTE:
/* use the status of the current reply */
status = msg->first_line.u.reply.status.s;
backup = status[msg->first_line.u.reply.status.len];
status[msg->first_line.u.reply.status.len] = 0;
break;
case FAILURE_ROUTE:
/* use the status of the winning reply */
if (t_pick_branch( -1, 0, t, &lowest_status)<0 ) {
LOG(L_CRIT,"BUG:t_check_status: t_pick_branch failed to get "
" a final response in MODE_ONFAILURE\n");
return -1;
}
status = int2str( lowest_status , 0);
break;
default:
LOG(L_ERR,"ERROR:t_check_status: unsupported route_type %d\n",
route_type);
return -1;
}
DBG("DEBUG:t_check_status: checked status is <%s>\n",status);
/* do the checking */
n = regexec((regex_t*)regexp, status, 1, &pmatch, 0);
if (backup) status[msg->first_line.u.reply.status.len] = backup;
if (n!=0) return -1;
return 1;
}
/* This is the neurological point of reply processing -- called
* from within a REPLY_LOCK, t_should_relay_response decides
* how a reply shall be processed and how transaction state is
* affected.
*
* Checks if the new reply (with new_code status) should be sent or not
* based on the current
* transaction status.
* Returns - branch number (0,1,...) which should be relayed
* -1 if nothing to be relayed
*/
static enum rps t_should_relay_response( struct cell *Trans , int new_code,
int branch , int *should_store, int *should_relay,
branch_bm_t *cancel_bitmap, struct sip_msg *reply )
{
int branch_cnt;
int picked_code;
int inv_through;
int do_cancel;
/* note: this code never lets replies to CANCEL go through;
we generate always a local 200 for CANCEL; 200s are
not relayed because it's not an INVITE transaction;
>= 300 are not relayed because 200 was already sent
out
*/
LM_DBG("T_code=%d, new_code=%d\n", Trans->uas.status,new_code);
inv_through=new_code>=200 && new_code<300 && is_invite(Trans);
/* if final response sent out, allow only INVITE 2xx */
if ( Trans->uas.status >= 200 ) {
if (inv_through) {
LM_DBG("200 OK for INVITE after final sent\n");
*should_store=0;
Trans->uac[branch].last_received=new_code;
*should_relay=branch;
return RPS_PUSHED_AFTER_COMPLETION;
}
if ( is_hopbyhop_cancel(Trans) && new_code>=200) {
*should_store=0;
*should_relay=-1;
picked_branch=-1;
return RPS_COMPLETED;
}
/* except the exception above, too late messages will
be discarded */
goto discard;
}
/* if final response received at this branch, allow only INVITE 2xx */
if (Trans->uac[branch].last_received>=200
&& !(inv_through && Trans->uac[branch].last_received<300)) {
#ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG
/* don't report on retransmissions */
if (Trans->uac[branch].last_received==new_code) {
LM_DBG("final reply retransmission\n");
} else
/* if you FR-timed-out, faked a local 408 and 487 came, don't
* report on it either */
if (Trans->uac[branch].last_received==408 && new_code==487) {
LM_DBG("487 reply came for a timed-out branch\n");
} else {
/* this looks however how a very strange status rewrite attempt;
* report on it */
LM_DBG("status rewrite by UAS: stored: %d, received: %d\n",
Trans->uac[branch].last_received, new_code );
}
#endif
goto discard;
}
/* no final response sent yet */
/* negative replies subject to fork picking */
if (new_code >=300 ) {
Trans->uac[branch].last_received=new_code;
/* also append the current reply to the transaction to
* make it available in failure routes - a kind of "fake"
* save of the final reply per branch */
Trans->uac[branch].reply = reply;
if (new_code>=600 && !disable_6xx_block) {
/* this is a winner and close all branches */
which_cancel( Trans, cancel_bitmap );
picked_branch=branch;
/* no more new branches should be added to this transaction */
Trans->flags |= T_NO_NEW_BRANCHES_FLAG;
} else {
/* if all_final return lowest */
picked_branch = t_pick_branch( Trans, &picked_code, &do_cancel);
if (picked_branch==-2) { /* branches open yet */
*should_store=1;
*should_relay=-1;
picked_branch=-1;
Trans->uac[branch].reply = 0;
return RPS_STORE;
}
if (picked_branch==-1) {
LM_CRIT("pick_branch failed (lowest==-1) for code %d\n",new_code);
Trans->uac[branch].reply = 0;
goto discard;
}
if (do_cancel) {
branch_bm_t cb = 0;
which_cancel( Trans, &cb );
cleanup_uac_timers(Trans);
cancel_uacs( Trans, cb);
}
}
/* no more pending branches -- try if that changes after
* a callback; save branch count to be able to determine
* later if new branches were initiated */
branch_cnt=Trans->nr_of_outgoings;
reset_kr();
if ( !(Trans->flags&T_NO_DNS_FAILOVER_FLAG) &&
Trans->uac[picked_branch].proxy!=NULL ) {
/* is is a DNS failover scenario, according to RFC 3263 ? */
if (is_3263_failure(Trans)) {
LM_DBG("trying DNS-based failover\n");
/* do DNS failover -> add new branches */
if (do_dns_failover( Trans )!=0) {
/* skip the failed added branches */
branch_cnt = Trans->nr_of_outgoings;
}
}
}
/* run ON_FAILURE handlers ( route and callbacks) */
if ( branch_cnt==Trans->nr_of_outgoings &&
(has_tran_tmcbs( Trans, TMCB_ON_FAILURE) || Trans->on_negative) ) {
run_failure_handlers( Trans );
}
/* now reset it; after the failure logic, the reply may
* not be stored any more and we don't want to keep into
* transaction some broken reference */
Trans->uac[branch].reply = 0;
/* look if the callback perhaps replied transaction; it also
covers the case in which a transaction is replied localy
on CANCEL -- then it would make no sense to proceed to
new branches bellow
*/
if (Trans->uas.status >= 200) {
*should_store=0;
*should_relay=-1;
/* this might deserve an improvement -- if something
was already replied, it was put on wait and then,
returning RPS_COMPLETED will make t_on_reply
put it on wait again; perhaps splitting put_on_wait
from send_reply or a new RPS_ code would be healthy
*/
picked_branch=-1;
return RPS_COMPLETED;
}
/* look if the callback/failure_route introduced new branches ... */
if (branch_cnt<Trans->nr_of_outgoings && get_kr()==REQ_FWDED) {
/* await then result of new branches */
*should_store=1;
*should_relay=-1;
picked_branch=-1;
return RPS_STORE;
}
/* really no more pending branches -- return selected code */
*should_store=0;
*should_relay=picked_branch;
picked_branch=-1;
return RPS_COMPLETED;
}
/* not >=300 ... it must be 2xx or provisional 1xx */
if (new_code>=100) {
/* 1xx and 2xx except 100 will be relayed */
Trans->uac[branch].last_received=new_code;
*should_store=0;
*should_relay= new_code==100? -1 : branch;
if (new_code>=200 ) {
which_cancel( Trans, cancel_bitmap );
return RPS_COMPLETED;
} else return RPS_PROVISIONAL;
}
discard:
*should_store=0;
*should_relay=-1;
return RPS_DISCARDED;
}
