コード例 #1
0
bool 
InstantiateTemplateParamRewriteVisitor::VisitTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc(
       TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc Loc)
{
  const TemplateTypeParmDecl *D = Loc.getDecl();
  if (D != ConsumerInstance->TheParameter)
    return true;

  // I know it's ugly, but seems sometimes Clang injects some extra
  // TypeLoc which causes the problem, for example, in the code below,
  // template<typename T> class A {
  // public:
  // template<typename T1> struct C { typedef A other; };
  // };
  // template<typename T1, typename T2> class B {
  //   typedef typename T2::template C<int>::other type;
  // };
  // class B<char, A<char> >;
  // the "typedef typename T2 ..." is treated as 
  //   typedef typename T2::template T2::C<int>::other type;
  // where the second T2 is injected by Clang
  void *Ptr = Loc.getBeginLoc().getPtrEncoding();
  if (ConsumerInstance->VisitedLocs.count(Ptr))
    return true;
  ConsumerInstance->VisitedLocs.insert(Ptr);

  SourceRange Range = Loc.getSourceRange();
  ConsumerInstance->TheRewriter.ReplaceText(Range, 
                       ConsumerInstance->TheInstantiationString);
  return true;
}
コード例 #2
0
bool TemplateInvalidParameterVisitor::VisitTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc(
       TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc Loc)
{
  const NamedDecl *ND = Loc.getDecl();
  if (ConsumerInstance->isBeforeColonColon(Loc))
    Parameters.insert(ND);

  return true;
}
コード例 #3
0
/// \brief Build a new nested-name-specifier for "identifier::", as described
/// by ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
///
/// This routine differs only slightly from ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier, in
/// that it contains an extra parameter \p ScopeLookupResult, which provides
/// the result of name lookup within the scope of the nested-name-specifier
/// that was computed at template definition time.
///
/// If ErrorRecoveryLookup is true, then this call is used to improve error
/// recovery.  This means that it should not emit diagnostics, it should
/// just return true on failure.  It also means it should only return a valid
/// scope if it *knows* that the result is correct.  It should not return in a
/// dependent context, for example. Nor will it extend \p SS with the scope
/// specifier.
bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
                                       IdentifierInfo &Identifier,
                                       SourceLocation IdentifierLoc,
                                       SourceLocation CCLoc,
                                       QualType ObjectType,
                                       bool EnteringContext,
                                       CXXScopeSpec &SS,
                                       NamedDecl *ScopeLookupResult,
                                       bool ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
  LookupResult Found(*this, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, 
                     LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);

  // Determine where to perform name lookup
  DeclContext *LookupCtx = 0;
  bool isDependent = false;
  if (!ObjectType.isNull()) {
    // This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression, e.g.,
    // x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
    assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
    LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
    isDependent = ObjectType->isDependentType();
  } else if (SS.isSet()) {
    // This nested-name-specifier occurs after another nested-name-specifier,
    // so look into the context associated with the prior nested-name-specifier.
    LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
    isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
    Found.setContextRange(SS.getRange());
  }


  bool ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = false;
  if (LookupCtx) {
    // Perform "qualified" name lookup into the declaration context we
    // computed, which is either the type of the base of a member access
    // expression or the declaration context associated with a prior
    // nested-name-specifier.

    // The declaration context must be complete.
    if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() &&
        RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx))
      return true;

    LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx);

    if (!ObjectType.isNull() && Found.empty()) {
      // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
      //   If the id-expression in a class member access is a qualified-id of
      //   the form
      //
      //        class-name-or-namespace-name::...
      //
      //   the class-name-or-namespace-name following the . or -> operator is
      //   looked up both in the context of the entire postfix-expression and in
      //   the scope of the class of the object expression. If the name is found
      //   only in the scope of the class of the object expression, the name
      //   shall refer to a class-name. If the name is found only in the
      //   context of the entire postfix-expression, the name shall refer to a
      //   class-name or namespace-name. [...]
      //
      // Qualified name lookup into a class will not find a namespace-name,
      // so we do not need to diagnose that case specifically. However,
      // this qualified name lookup may find nothing. In that case, perform
      // unqualified name lookup in the given scope (if available) or
      // reconstruct the result from when name lookup was performed at template
      // definition time.
      if (S)
        LookupName(Found, S);
      else if (ScopeLookupResult)
        Found.addDecl(ScopeLookupResult);

      ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true;
    }
  } else if (!isDependent) {
    // Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
    LookupName(Found, S);
  }

  // If we performed lookup into a dependent context and did not find anything,
  // that's fine: just build a dependent nested-name-specifier.
  if (Found.empty() && isDependent &&
      !(LookupCtx && LookupCtx->isRecord() &&
        (!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasDefinition() ||
         !cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasAnyDependentBases()))) {
    // Don't speculate if we're just trying to improve error recovery.
    if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
      return true;
    
    // We were not able to compute the declaration context for a dependent
    // base object type or prior nested-name-specifier, so this
    // nested-name-specifier refers to an unknown specialization. Just build
    // a dependent nested-name-specifier.
    SS.Extend(Context, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
    return false;
  } 
  
  // FIXME: Deal with ambiguities cleanly.

  if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
    // We haven't found anything, and we're not recovering from a
    // different kind of error, so look for typos.
    DeclarationName Name = Found.getLookupName();
    TypoCorrection Corrected;
    Found.clear();
    if ((Corrected = CorrectTypo(Found.getLookupNameInfo(),
                                 Found.getLookupKind(), S, &SS, LookupCtx,
                                 EnteringContext, CTC_NoKeywords)) &&
        isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(Corrected.getCorrectionDecl())) {
      std::string CorrectedStr(Corrected.getAsString(getLangOptions()));
      std::string CorrectedQuotedStr(Corrected.getQuoted(getLangOptions()));
      if (LookupCtx)
        Diag(Found.getNameLoc(), diag::err_no_member_suggest)
          << Name << LookupCtx << CorrectedQuotedStr << SS.getRange()
          << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Found.getNameLoc(), CorrectedStr);
      else
        Diag(Found.getNameLoc(), diag::err_undeclared_var_use_suggest)
          << Name << CorrectedQuotedStr
          << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Found.getNameLoc(), CorrectedStr);
      
      if (NamedDecl *ND = Corrected.getCorrectionDecl()) {
        Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl) << CorrectedQuotedStr;
        Found.addDecl(ND);
      }
      Found.setLookupName(Corrected.getCorrection());
    } else {
      Found.setLookupName(&Identifier);
    }
  }

  NamedDecl *SD = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
  if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD)) {
    if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) {
      // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
      //   [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the
      //   class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity.
      //
      // We already found the name in the scope of the object. Now, look
      // into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to
      // see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no
      // scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself.
      NamedDecl *OuterDecl;
      if (S) {
        LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, 
                                LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
        LookupName(FoundOuter, S);
        OuterDecl = FoundOuter.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
      } else
        OuterDecl = ScopeLookupResult;

      if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(OuterDecl) &&
          OuterDecl->getCanonicalDecl() != SD->getCanonicalDecl() &&
          (!isa<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl) || !isa<TypeDecl>(SD) ||
           !Context.hasSameType(
                            Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl)),
                               Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD))))) {
         if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
           return true;

         Diag(IdentifierLoc, 
              diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
           << &Identifier;
         Diag(SD->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_object_type)
           << ObjectType;
         Diag(OuterDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_scope);

         // Fall through so that we'll pick the name we found in the object
         // type, since that's probably what the user wanted anyway.
       }
    }

    // If we're just performing this lookup for error-recovery purposes, 
    // don't extend the nested-name-specifier. Just return now.
    if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
      return false;
    
    if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD)) {
      SS.Extend(Context, Namespace, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
      return false;
    }

    if (NamespaceAliasDecl *Alias = dyn_cast<NamespaceAliasDecl>(SD)) {
      SS.Extend(Context, Alias, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
      return false;
    }

    QualType T = Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD));
    TypeLocBuilder TLB;
    if (isa<InjectedClassNameType>(T)) {
      InjectedClassNameTypeLoc InjectedTL
        = TLB.push<InjectedClassNameTypeLoc>(T);
      InjectedTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<RecordType>(T)) {
      RecordTypeLoc RecordTL = TLB.push<RecordTypeLoc>(T);
      RecordTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<TypedefType>(T)) {
      TypedefTypeLoc TypedefTL = TLB.push<TypedefTypeLoc>(T);
      TypedefTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<EnumType>(T)) {
      EnumTypeLoc EnumTL = TLB.push<EnumTypeLoc>(T);
      EnumTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<TemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
      TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TemplateTypeTL
        = TLB.push<TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
      TemplateTypeTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<UnresolvedUsingType>(T)) {
      UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc UnresolvedTL
        = TLB.push<UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc>(T);
      UnresolvedTL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
      SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TL 
        = TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
      TL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType>(T)) {
      SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc TL
        = TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc>(T);
      TL.setNameLoc(IdentifierLoc);
    } else {
      llvm_unreachable("Unhandled TypeDecl node in nested-name-specifier");
    }

    if (T->isEnumeralType())
      Diag(IdentifierLoc, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_enum_nested_name_spec);

    SS.Extend(Context, SourceLocation(), TLB.getTypeLocInContext(Context, T),
              CCLoc);
    return false;
  }

  // Otherwise, we have an error case.  If we don't want diagnostics, just
  // return an error now.
  if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
    return true;

  // If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with
  // ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error
  // messages.
  if (Found.empty()) {
    Found.clear(LookupOrdinaryName);
    LookupName(Found, S);
  }

  // In Microsoft mode, if we are within a templated function and we can't
  // resolve Identifier, then extend the SS with Identifier. This will have 
  // the effect of resolving Identifier during template instantiation. 
  // The goal is to be able to resolve a function call whose
  // nested-name-specifier is located inside a dependent base class.
  // Example: 
  //
  // class C {
  // public:
  //    static void foo2() {  }
  // };
  // template <class T> class A { public: typedef C D; };
  //
  // template <class T> class B : public A<T> {
  // public:
  //   void foo() { D::foo2(); }
  // };
  if (getLangOptions().MicrosoftExt) {
    DeclContext *DC = LookupCtx ? LookupCtx : CurContext;
    if (DC->isDependentContext() && DC->isFunctionOrMethod()) {
      SS.Extend(Context, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, CCLoc);
      return false;
    }
  }

  unsigned DiagID;
  if (!Found.empty())
    DiagID = diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace;
  else if (SS.isSet()) {
    Diag(IdentifierLoc, diag::err_no_member) 
      << &Identifier << LookupCtx << SS.getRange();
    return true;
  } else
    DiagID = diag::err_undeclared_var_use;

  if (SS.isSet())
    Diag(IdentifierLoc, DiagID) << &Identifier << SS.getRange();
  else
    Diag(IdentifierLoc, DiagID) << &Identifier;

  return true;
}
コード例 #4
0
ファイル: SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp プロジェクト: jvesely/clang
/// Build a new nested-name-specifier for "identifier::", as described
/// by ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
///
/// \param S Scope in which the nested-name-specifier occurs.
/// \param IdInfo Parser information about an identifier in the
///        nested-name-spec.
/// \param EnteringContext If true, enter the context specified by the
///        nested-name-specifier.
/// \param SS Optional nested name specifier preceding the identifier.
/// \param ScopeLookupResult Provides the result of name lookup within the
///        scope of the nested-name-specifier that was computed at template
///        definition time.
/// \param ErrorRecoveryLookup Specifies if the method is called to improve
///        error recovery and what kind of recovery is performed.
/// \param IsCorrectedToColon If not null, suggestion of replace '::' -> ':'
///        are allowed.  The bool value pointed by this parameter is set to
///       'true' if the identifier is treated as if it was followed by ':',
///        not '::'.
/// \param OnlyNamespace If true, only considers namespaces in lookup.
///
/// This routine differs only slightly from ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier, in
/// that it contains an extra parameter \p ScopeLookupResult, which provides
/// the result of name lookup within the scope of the nested-name-specifier
/// that was computed at template definition time.
///
/// If ErrorRecoveryLookup is true, then this call is used to improve error
/// recovery.  This means that it should not emit diagnostics, it should
/// just return true on failure.  It also means it should only return a valid
/// scope if it *knows* that the result is correct.  It should not return in a
/// dependent context, for example. Nor will it extend \p SS with the scope
/// specifier.
bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, NestedNameSpecInfo &IdInfo,
                                       bool EnteringContext, CXXScopeSpec &SS,
                                       NamedDecl *ScopeLookupResult,
                                       bool ErrorRecoveryLookup,
                                       bool *IsCorrectedToColon,
                                       bool OnlyNamespace) {
  if (IdInfo.Identifier->isEditorPlaceholder())
    return true;
  LookupResult Found(*this, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
                     OnlyNamespace ? LookupNamespaceName
                                   : LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
  QualType ObjectType = GetTypeFromParser(IdInfo.ObjectType);

  // Determine where to perform name lookup
  DeclContext *LookupCtx = nullptr;
  bool isDependent = false;
  if (IsCorrectedToColon)
    *IsCorrectedToColon = false;
  if (!ObjectType.isNull()) {
    // This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression, e.g.,
    // x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
    assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
    LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
    isDependent = ObjectType->isDependentType();
  } else if (SS.isSet()) {
    // This nested-name-specifier occurs after another nested-name-specifier,
    // so look into the context associated with the prior nested-name-specifier.
    LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
    isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
    Found.setContextRange(SS.getRange());
  }

  bool ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = false;
  if (LookupCtx) {
    // Perform "qualified" name lookup into the declaration context we
    // computed, which is either the type of the base of a member access
    // expression or the declaration context associated with a prior
    // nested-name-specifier.

    // The declaration context must be complete.
    if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() &&
        RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx))
      return true;

    LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx);

    if (!ObjectType.isNull() && Found.empty()) {
      // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
      //   If the id-expression in a class member access is a qualified-id of
      //   the form
      //
      //        class-name-or-namespace-name::...
      //
      //   the class-name-or-namespace-name following the . or -> operator is
      //   looked up both in the context of the entire postfix-expression and in
      //   the scope of the class of the object expression. If the name is found
      //   only in the scope of the class of the object expression, the name
      //   shall refer to a class-name. If the name is found only in the
      //   context of the entire postfix-expression, the name shall refer to a
      //   class-name or namespace-name. [...]
      //
      // Qualified name lookup into a class will not find a namespace-name,
      // so we do not need to diagnose that case specifically. However,
      // this qualified name lookup may find nothing. In that case, perform
      // unqualified name lookup in the given scope (if available) or
      // reconstruct the result from when name lookup was performed at template
      // definition time.
      if (S)
        LookupName(Found, S);
      else if (ScopeLookupResult)
        Found.addDecl(ScopeLookupResult);

      ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true;
    }
  } else if (!isDependent) {
    // Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
    LookupName(Found, S);
  }

  if (Found.isAmbiguous())
    return true;

  // If we performed lookup into a dependent context and did not find anything,
  // that's fine: just build a dependent nested-name-specifier.
  if (Found.empty() && isDependent &&
      !(LookupCtx && LookupCtx->isRecord() &&
        (!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasDefinition() ||
         !cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasAnyDependentBases()))) {
    // Don't speculate if we're just trying to improve error recovery.
    if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
      return true;

    // We were not able to compute the declaration context for a dependent
    // base object type or prior nested-name-specifier, so this
    // nested-name-specifier refers to an unknown specialization. Just build
    // a dependent nested-name-specifier.
    SS.Extend(Context, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, IdInfo.CCLoc);
    return false;
  }

  if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup) {
    // If identifier is not found as class-name-or-namespace-name, but is found
    // as other entity, don't look for typos.
    LookupResult R(*this, Found.getLookupNameInfo(), LookupOrdinaryName);
    if (LookupCtx)
      LookupQualifiedName(R, LookupCtx);
    else if (S && !isDependent)
      LookupName(R, S);
    if (!R.empty()) {
      // Don't diagnose problems with this speculative lookup.
      R.suppressDiagnostics();
      // The identifier is found in ordinary lookup. If correction to colon is
      // allowed, suggest replacement to ':'.
      if (IsCorrectedToColon) {
        *IsCorrectedToColon = true;
        Diag(IdInfo.CCLoc, diag::err_nested_name_spec_is_not_class)
            << IdInfo.Identifier << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus
            << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(IdInfo.CCLoc, ":");
        if (NamedDecl *ND = R.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
          Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_declared_at);
        return true;
      }
      // Replacement '::' -> ':' is not allowed, just issue respective error.
      Diag(R.getNameLoc(), OnlyNamespace
                               ? unsigned(diag::err_expected_namespace_name)
                               : unsigned(diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace))
          << IdInfo.Identifier << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus;
      if (NamedDecl *ND = R.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
        Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_entity_declared_at)
            << IdInfo.Identifier;
      return true;
    }
  }

  if (Found.empty() && !ErrorRecoveryLookup && !getLangOpts().MSVCCompat) {
    // We haven't found anything, and we're not recovering from a
    // different kind of error, so look for typos.
    DeclarationName Name = Found.getLookupName();
    Found.clear();
    NestedNameSpecifierValidatorCCC CCC(*this);
    if (TypoCorrection Corrected = CorrectTypo(
            Found.getLookupNameInfo(), Found.getLookupKind(), S, &SS, CCC,
            CTK_ErrorRecovery, LookupCtx, EnteringContext)) {
      if (LookupCtx) {
        bool DroppedSpecifier =
            Corrected.WillReplaceSpecifier() &&
            Name.getAsString() == Corrected.getAsString(getLangOpts());
        if (DroppedSpecifier)
          SS.clear();
        diagnoseTypo(Corrected, PDiag(diag::err_no_member_suggest)
                                  << Name << LookupCtx << DroppedSpecifier
                                  << SS.getRange());
      } else
        diagnoseTypo(Corrected, PDiag(diag::err_undeclared_var_use_suggest)
                                  << Name);

      if (Corrected.getCorrectionSpecifier())
        SS.MakeTrivial(Context, Corrected.getCorrectionSpecifier(),
                       SourceRange(Found.getNameLoc()));

      if (NamedDecl *ND = Corrected.getFoundDecl())
        Found.addDecl(ND);
      Found.setLookupName(Corrected.getCorrection());
    } else {
      Found.setLookupName(IdInfo.Identifier);
    }
  }

  NamedDecl *SD =
      Found.isSingleResult() ? Found.getRepresentativeDecl() : nullptr;
  bool IsExtension = false;
  bool AcceptSpec = isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD, &IsExtension);
  if (!AcceptSpec && IsExtension) {
    AcceptSpec = true;
    Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::ext_nested_name_spec_is_enum);
  }
  if (AcceptSpec) {
    if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope &&
        !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) {
      // C++03 [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
      //   [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the
      //   class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity.
      //
      // We already found the name in the scope of the object. Now, look
      // into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to
      // see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no
      // scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself.
      //
      // Note that C++11 does *not* perform this redundant lookup.
      NamedDecl *OuterDecl;
      if (S) {
        LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
                                LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
        LookupName(FoundOuter, S);
        OuterDecl = FoundOuter.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
      } else
        OuterDecl = ScopeLookupResult;

      if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(OuterDecl) &&
          OuterDecl->getCanonicalDecl() != SD->getCanonicalDecl() &&
          (!isa<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl) || !isa<TypeDecl>(SD) ||
           !Context.hasSameType(
                            Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(OuterDecl)),
                               Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD))))) {
        if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
          return true;

         Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
              diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
           << IdInfo.Identifier;
         Diag(SD->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_object_type)
           << ObjectType;
         Diag(OuterDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_scope);

         // Fall through so that we'll pick the name we found in the object
         // type, since that's probably what the user wanted anyway.
       }
    }

    if (auto *TD = dyn_cast_or_null<TypedefNameDecl>(SD))
      MarkAnyDeclReferenced(TD->getLocation(), TD, /*OdrUse=*/false);

    // If we're just performing this lookup for error-recovery purposes,
    // don't extend the nested-name-specifier. Just return now.
    if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
      return false;

    // The use of a nested name specifier may trigger deprecation warnings.
    DiagnoseUseOfDecl(SD, IdInfo.CCLoc);

    if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD)) {
      SS.Extend(Context, Namespace, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, IdInfo.CCLoc);
      return false;
    }

    if (NamespaceAliasDecl *Alias = dyn_cast<NamespaceAliasDecl>(SD)) {
      SS.Extend(Context, Alias, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, IdInfo.CCLoc);
      return false;
    }

    QualType T =
        Context.getTypeDeclType(cast<TypeDecl>(SD->getUnderlyingDecl()));
    TypeLocBuilder TLB;
    if (isa<InjectedClassNameType>(T)) {
      InjectedClassNameTypeLoc InjectedTL
        = TLB.push<InjectedClassNameTypeLoc>(T);
      InjectedTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<RecordType>(T)) {
      RecordTypeLoc RecordTL = TLB.push<RecordTypeLoc>(T);
      RecordTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<TypedefType>(T)) {
      TypedefTypeLoc TypedefTL = TLB.push<TypedefTypeLoc>(T);
      TypedefTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<EnumType>(T)) {
      EnumTypeLoc EnumTL = TLB.push<EnumTypeLoc>(T);
      EnumTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<TemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
      TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TemplateTypeTL
        = TLB.push<TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
      TemplateTypeTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<UnresolvedUsingType>(T)) {
      UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc UnresolvedTL
        = TLB.push<UnresolvedUsingTypeLoc>(T);
      UnresolvedTL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(T)) {
      SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc TL
        = TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmTypeLoc>(T);
      TL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType>(T)) {
      SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc TL
        = TLB.push<SubstTemplateTypeParmPackTypeLoc>(T);
      TL.setNameLoc(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc);
    } else {
      llvm_unreachable("Unhandled TypeDecl node in nested-name-specifier");
    }

    if (T->isEnumeralType())
      Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_enum_nested_name_spec);

    SS.Extend(Context, SourceLocation(), TLB.getTypeLocInContext(Context, T),
              IdInfo.CCLoc);
    return false;
  }

  // Otherwise, we have an error case.  If we don't want diagnostics, just
  // return an error now.
  if (ErrorRecoveryLookup)
    return true;

  // If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with
  // ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error
  // messages.
  if (Found.empty()) {
    Found.clear(LookupOrdinaryName);
    LookupName(Found, S);
  }

  // In Microsoft mode, if we are within a templated function and we can't
  // resolve Identifier, then extend the SS with Identifier. This will have
  // the effect of resolving Identifier during template instantiation.
  // The goal is to be able to resolve a function call whose
  // nested-name-specifier is located inside a dependent base class.
  // Example:
  //
  // class C {
  // public:
  //    static void foo2() {  }
  // };
  // template <class T> class A { public: typedef C D; };
  //
  // template <class T> class B : public A<T> {
  // public:
  //   void foo() { D::foo2(); }
  // };
  if (getLangOpts().MSVCCompat) {
    DeclContext *DC = LookupCtx ? LookupCtx : CurContext;
    if (DC->isDependentContext() && DC->isFunctionOrMethod()) {
      CXXRecordDecl *ContainingClass = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC->getParent());
      if (ContainingClass && ContainingClass->hasAnyDependentBases()) {
        Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
             diag::ext_undeclared_unqual_id_with_dependent_base)
            << IdInfo.Identifier << ContainingClass;
        SS.Extend(Context, IdInfo.Identifier, IdInfo.IdentifierLoc,
                  IdInfo.CCLoc);
        return false;
      }
    }
  }

  if (!Found.empty()) {
    if (TypeDecl *TD = Found.getAsSingle<TypeDecl>())
      Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace)
          << Context.getTypeDeclType(TD) << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus;
    else {
      Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace)
          << IdInfo.Identifier << getLangOpts().CPlusPlus;
      if (NamedDecl *ND = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>())
        Diag(ND->getLocation(), diag::note_entity_declared_at)
            << IdInfo.Identifier;
    }
  } else if (SS.isSet())
    Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_no_member) << IdInfo.Identifier
        << LookupCtx << SS.getRange();
  else
    Diag(IdInfo.IdentifierLoc, diag::err_undeclared_var_use)
        << IdInfo.Identifier;

  return true;
}