void TransactionMatcher::match(MyMoneyTransaction tm, MyMoneySplit sm, MyMoneyTransaction ti, MyMoneySplit si, bool allowImportedTransactions)
{
const MyMoneySecurity& sec = MyMoneyFile::instance()->security(m_account.currencyId());
// Now match the transactions.
//
// 'Matching' the transactions entails DELETING the end transaction,
// and MODIFYING the start transaction as needed.
//
// There are a variety of ways that a transaction can conflict.
// Post date, splits, amount are the ones that seem to matter.
// TODO: Handle these conflicts intelligently, at least warning
// the user, or better yet letting the user choose which to use.
//
// For now, we will just use the transaction details from the start
// transaction. The only thing we'll take from the end transaction
// are the bank ID's.
//
// What we have to do here is iterate over the splits in the end
// transaction, and find the corresponding split in the start
// transaction. If there is a bankID in the end split but not the
// start split, add it to the start split. If there is a bankID
// in BOTH, then this transaction cannot be merged (both transactions
// were imported!!) If the corresponding start split cannot be
// found and the end split has a bankID, we should probably just fail.
// Although we could ADD it to the transaction.
// ipwizard: Don't know if iterating over the transactions is a good idea.
// In case of a split transaction recorded with KMyMoney and the transaction
// data being imported consisting only of a single category assignment, this
// does not make much sense. The same applies for investment transactions
// stored in KMyMoney against imported transactions. I think a better solution
// is to just base the match on the splits referencing the same (currently
// selected) account.
// verify, that tm is a manual (non-matched) transaction
// allow matching two manual transactions
if ((!allowImportedTransactions && tm.isImported()) || sm.isMatched())
throw MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("First transaction does not match requirement for matching"));
// verify that the amounts are the same, otherwise we should not be matching!
if (sm.shares() != si.shares()) {
throw MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Splits for %1 have conflicting values (%2,%3)", m_account.name(), MyMoneyUtils::formatMoney(sm.shares(), m_account, sec), MyMoneyUtils::formatMoney(si.shares(), m_account, sec)));
}
// check that dates are within user's setting
const int gap = abs(tm.postDate().toJulianDay() - ti.postDate().toJulianDay());
if (gap > KMyMoneyGlobalSettings::matchInterval()) {
int rc = KMessageBox::questionYesNo(0, i18np("The transaction dates are one day apart. Do you want to match them anyway?",
"The transaction dates are %1 days apart. Do you want to match them anyway?", gap));
if (rc == KMessageBox::No) {
return;
}
}
// ipwizard: I took over the code to keep the bank id found in the endMatchTransaction
// This might not work for QIF imports as they don't setup this information. It sure
// makes sense for OFX and HBCI.
const QString& bankID = si.bankID();
if (!bankID.isEmpty()) {
try {
if (sm.bankID().isEmpty()) {
sm.setBankID(bankID);
tm.modifySplit(sm);
}
} catch (const MyMoneyException &e) {
QString estr = e.what();
throw MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Unable to match all splits (%1)", estr));
}
}
//
// we now allow matching of two non-imported transactions
//
// mark the split as cleared if it does not have a reconciliation information yet
if (sm.reconcileFlag() == MyMoneySplit::NotReconciled) {
sm.setReconcileFlag(MyMoneySplit::Cleared);
}
// if we don't have a payee assigned to the manually entered transaction
// we use the one we found in the imported transaction
if (sm.payeeId().isEmpty() && !si.payeeId().isEmpty()) {
sm.setValue("kmm-orig-payee", sm.payeeId());
sm.setPayeeId(si.payeeId());
}
// We use the imported postdate and keep the previous one for unmatch
if (tm.postDate() != ti.postDate()) {
sm.setValue("kmm-orig-postdate", tm.postDate().toString(Qt::ISODate));
tm.setPostDate(ti.postDate());
}
// combine the two memos into one
QString memo = sm.memo();
if (!si.memo().isEmpty() && si.memo() != memo) {
sm.setValue("kmm-orig-memo", memo);
if (!memo.isEmpty())
memo += '\n';
memo += si.memo();
}
sm.setMemo(memo);
// remember the split we matched
sm.setValue("kmm-match-split", si.id());
sm.addMatch(ti);
tm.modifySplit(sm);
ti.modifySplit(si);///
MyMoneyFile::instance()->modifyTransaction(tm);
// Delete the end transaction if it was stored in the engine
if (!ti.id().isEmpty())
MyMoneyFile::instance()->removeTransaction(ti);
}
void TransactionMatcher::match(MyMoneyTransaction tm, MyMoneySplit sm, MyMoneyTransaction ti, MyMoneySplit si, bool allowImportedTransactions)
{
const MyMoneySecurity& sec = MyMoneyFile::instance()->security(m_account.currencyId());
// Now match the transactions.
//
// 'Matching' the transactions entails DELETING the end transaction,
// and MODIFYING the start transaction as needed.
//
// There are a variety of ways that a transaction can conflict.
// Post date, splits, amount are the ones that seem to matter.
// TODO: Handle these conflicts intelligently, at least warning
// the user, or better yet letting the user choose which to use.
//
// For now, we will just use the transaction details from the start
// transaction. The only thing we'll take from the end transaction
// are the bank ID's.
//
// What we have to do here is iterate over the splits in the end
// transaction, and find the corresponding split in the start
// transaction. If there is a bankID in the end split but not the
// start split, add it to the start split. If there is a bankID
// in BOTH, then this transaction cannot be merged (both transactions
// were imported!!) If the corresponding start split cannot be
// found and the end split has a bankID, we should probably just fail.
// Although we could ADD it to the transaction.
// ipwizard: Don't know if iterating over the transactions is a good idea.
// In case of a split transaction recorded with KMyMoney and the transaction
// data being imported consisting only of a single category assignment, this
// does not make much sense. The same applies for investment transactions
// stored in KMyMoney against imported transactions. I think a better solution
// is to just base the match on the splits referencing the same (currently
// selected) account.
// verify, that tm is a manually (non-matched) transaction and ti an imported one
if(sm.isMatched() || (!allowImportedTransactions && tm.isImported()))
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("First transaction does not match requirement for matching"));
if(!ti.isImported())
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Second transaction does not match requirement for matching"));
// verify that the amounts are the same, otherwise we should not be matching!
if(sm.shares() != si.shares()) {
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Splits for %1 have conflicting values (%2,%3)").arg(m_account.name()).arg(sm.shares().formatMoney(m_account, sec), si.shares().formatMoney(m_account, sec)));
}
// ipwizard: I took over the code to keep the bank id found in the endMatchTransaction
// This might not work for QIF imports as they don't setup this information. It sure
// makes sense for OFX and HBCI.
const QString& bankID = si.bankID();
if (!bankID.isEmpty()) {
try {
if (sm.bankID().isEmpty() ) {
sm.setBankID( bankID );
tm.modifySplit(sm);
} else if(sm.bankID() != bankID) {
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Both of these transactions have been imported into %1. Therefore they cannot be matched. Matching works with one imported transaction and one non-imported transaction.").arg(m_account.name()));
}
} catch(MyMoneyException *e) {
QString estr = e->what();
delete e;
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Unable to match all splits (%1)").arg(estr));
}
}
#if 0 // Ace's original code
// TODO (Ace) Add in another error to catch the case where a user
// tries to match two hand-entered transactions.
QValueList<MyMoneySplit> endSplits = endMatchTransaction.splits();
QValueList<MyMoneySplit>::const_iterator it_split = endSplits.begin();
while (it_split != endSplits.end())
{
// find the corresponding split in the start transaction
MyMoneySplit startSplit;
QString accountid = (*it_split).accountId();
try
{
startSplit = startMatchTransaction.splitByAccount( accountid );
}
// only exception is thrown if we cannot find a split like this
catch(MyMoneyException *e)
{
delete e;
startSplit = (*it_split);
startSplit.clearId();
startMatchTransaction.addSplit(startSplit);
}
// verify that the amounts are the same, otherwise we should not be
// matching!
if ( (*it_split).value() != startSplit.value() )
{
QString accountname = MyMoneyFile::instance()->account(accountid).name();
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Splits for %1 have conflicting values (%2,%3)").arg(accountname).arg((*it_split).value().formatMoney(),startSplit.value().formatMoney()));
}
QString bankID = (*it_split).bankID();
if ( ! bankID.isEmpty() )
{
try
{
if ( startSplit.bankID().isEmpty() )
{
startSplit.setBankID( bankID );
startMatchTransaction.modifySplit(startSplit);
}
else
{
QString accountname = MyMoneyFile::instance()->account(accountid).name();
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Both of these transactions have been imported into %1. Therefore they cannot be matched. Matching works with one imported transaction and one non-imported transaction.").arg(accountname));
}
}
catch(MyMoneyException *e)
{
QString estr = e->what();
delete e;
throw new MYMONEYEXCEPTION(i18n("Unable to match all splits (%1)").arg(estr));
}
}
++it_split;
}
#endif
// mark the split as cleared if it does not have a reconciliation information yet
if(sm.reconcileFlag() == MyMoneySplit::NotReconciled) {
sm.setReconcileFlag(MyMoneySplit::Cleared);
}
// if we don't have a payee assigned to the manually entered transaction
// we use the one we found in the imported transaction
if(sm.payeeId().isEmpty() && !si.payeeId().isEmpty()) {
sm.setValue("kmm-orig-payee", sm.payeeId());
sm.setPayeeId(si.payeeId());
}
// We use the imported postdate and keep the previous one for unmatch
if(tm.postDate() != ti.postDate()) {
sm.setValue("kmm-orig-postdate", tm.postDate().toString(Qt::ISODate));
tm.setPostDate(ti.postDate());
}
// combine the two memos into one
QString memo = sm.memo();
if(!si.memo().isEmpty() && si.memo() != memo) {
sm.setValue("kmm-orig-memo", memo);
if(!memo.isEmpty())
memo += "\n";
memo += si.memo();
}
sm.setMemo(memo);
// remember the split we matched
sm.setValue("kmm-match-split", si.id());
sm.addMatch(ti);
tm.modifySplit(sm);
MyMoneyFile::instance()->modifyTransaction(tm);
// Delete the end transaction if it was stored in the engine
if(!ti.id().isEmpty())
MyMoneyFile::instance()->removeTransaction(ti);
}