void SetInterrupt(u32 _causemask, bool _bSet)
{
_dbg_assert_msg_(POWERPC, Core::IsCPUThread(), "SetInterrupt from wrong thread");
if (_bSet && !(m_InterruptCause & _causemask))
{
DEBUG_LOG(PROCESSORINTERFACE, "Setting Interrupt %s (set)", Debug_GetInterruptName(_causemask));
}
if (!_bSet && (m_InterruptCause & _causemask))
{
DEBUG_LOG(PROCESSORINTERFACE, "Setting Interrupt %s (clear)", Debug_GetInterruptName(_causemask));
}
if (_bSet)
m_InterruptCause |= _causemask;
else
m_InterruptCause &= ~_causemask;// is there any reason to have this possibility?
// F|RES: i think the hw devices reset the interrupt in the PI to 0
// if the interrupt cause is eliminated. that isn't done by software (afaik)
UpdateException();
}
void SetInterrupt(u32 _causemask, bool _bSet)
{
// TODO(ector): add sanity check that current thread id is cpu thread
if (_bSet && !(m_InterruptCause & _causemask))
{
DEBUG_LOG(PROCESSORINTERFACE, "Setting Interrupt %s (set)", Debug_GetInterruptName(_causemask));
}
if (!_bSet && (m_InterruptCause & _causemask))
{
DEBUG_LOG(PROCESSORINTERFACE, "Setting Interrupt %s (clear)", Debug_GetInterruptName(_causemask));
}
if (_bSet)
Common::AtomicOr(m_InterruptCause, _causemask);
else
Common::AtomicAnd(m_InterruptCause, ~_causemask);// is there any reason to have this possibility?
// F|RES: i think the hw devices reset the interrupt in the PI to 0
// if the interrupt cause is eliminated. that isnt done by software (afaik)
UpdateException();
}
