QString ConstraintsChecker::portName(const QString &robotId
, model::RobotModel * const robot, const kitBase::robotModel::PortInfo &port) const
{
// We wish to know would be there a collision if someone writes "A1" or not.
int portsWithSuchName = 0;
for (kitBase::robotModel::PortInfo &otherPort : robot->info().availablePorts()) {
if (port.name() == otherPort.name()) {
++portsWithSuchName;
}
}
// Making user write "robot1.DisplayPort_out.ellipses" or "robot1.MarkerPort_out" is non-humanistic.
// So letting him write "robot1.display.ellipses" or "robot1.marker".
QRegExp portRegExp("^(\\w+)Port$");
const QString readablePortName = portRegExp.exactMatch(port.name())
? utils::StringUtils::lowercaseFirstLetter(portRegExp.cap(1))
: port.name();
return portsWithSuchName > 1
// If collision in name exists then user must specify what port exactly he wishes to process.
? QString("%1.%2_%3").arg(robotId, readablePortName
, port.direction() == kitBase::robotModel::input ? "in" : "out")
: QString("%1.%2").arg(robotId, readablePortName);
}
QString ConstraintsChecker::portName(const QString &robotId, const kitBase::robotModel::PortInfo &port) const
{
return QString("%1.%2_%3").arg(robotId, port.name()
, port.direction() == kitBase::robotModel::input ? "in" : "out");
}