int BlockAssembler::UpdatePackagesForAdded(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& alreadyAdded,
indexed_modified_transaction_set &mapModifiedTx)
{
int nDescendantsUpdated = 0;
for (const CTxMemPool::txiter it : alreadyAdded) {
CTxMemPool::setEntries descendants;
mempool.CalculateDescendants(it, descendants);
// Insert all descendants (not yet in block) into the modified set
for (CTxMemPool::txiter desc : descendants) {
if (alreadyAdded.count(desc))
continue;
++nDescendantsUpdated;
modtxiter mit = mapModifiedTx.find(desc);
if (mit == mapModifiedTx.end()) {
CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry modEntry(desc);
modEntry.nSizeWithAncestors -= it->GetTxSize();
modEntry.nModFeesWithAncestors -= it->GetModifiedFee();
modEntry.nSigOpCostWithAncestors -= it->GetSigOpCost();
mapModifiedTx.insert(modEntry);
} else {
mapModifiedTx.modify(mit, update_for_parent_inclusion(it));
}
}
}
return nDescendantsUpdated;
}
// Skip entries in mapTx that are already in a block or are present
// in mapModifiedTx (which implies that the mapTx ancestor state is
// stale due to ancestor inclusion in the block)
// Also skip transactions that we've already failed to add. This can happen if
// we consider a transaction in mapModifiedTx and it fails: we can then
// potentially consider it again while walking mapTx. It's currently
// guaranteed to fail again, but as a belt-and-suspenders check we put it in
// failedTx and avoid re-evaluation, since the re-evaluation would be using
// cached size/sigops/fee values that are not actually correct.
bool BlockAssembler::SkipMapTxEntry(CTxMemPool::txiter it, indexed_modified_transaction_set &mapModifiedTx, CTxMemPool::setEntries &failedTx)
{
assert (it != mempool.mapTx.end());
return mapModifiedTx.count(it) || inBlock.count(it) || failedTx.count(it);
}