ProgramStateRef SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux(ProgramStateRef State,
                                                   NonLoc Cond,
                                                   bool Assumption) {

  // We cannot reason about SymSymExprs, and can only reason about some
  // SymIntExprs.
  if (!canReasonAbout(Cond)) {
    // Just add the constraint to the expression without trying to simplify.
    SymbolRef Sym = Cond.getAsSymExpr();
    return assumeAuxForSymbol(State, Sym, Assumption);
  }

  switch (Cond.getSubKind()) {
  default:
    llvm_unreachable("'Assume' not implemented for this NonLoc");

  case nonloc::SymbolValKind: {
    nonloc::SymbolVal SV = Cond.castAs<nonloc::SymbolVal>();
    SymbolRef Sym = SV.getSymbol();
    assert(Sym);

    // Handle SymbolData.
    if (!SV.isExpression()) {
      return assumeAuxForSymbol(State, Sym, Assumption);

      // Handle symbolic expression.
    } else if (const SymIntExpr *SE = dyn_cast<SymIntExpr>(Sym)) {
      // We can only simplify expressions whose RHS is an integer.

      BinaryOperator::Opcode Op = SE->getOpcode();
      if (BinaryOperator::isComparisonOp(Op)) {
        if (!Assumption)
          Op = BinaryOperator::negateComparisonOp(Op);

        return assumeSymRel(State, SE->getLHS(), Op, SE->getRHS());
      }

    } else if (const SymSymExpr *SSE = dyn_cast<SymSymExpr>(Sym)) {
      // Translate "a != b" to "(b - a) != 0".
      // We invert the order of the operands as a heuristic for how loop
      // conditions are usually written ("begin != end") as compared to length
      // calculations ("end - begin"). The more correct thing to do would be to
      // canonicalize "a - b" and "b - a", which would allow us to treat
      // "a != b" and "b != a" the same.
      SymbolManager &SymMgr = getSymbolManager();
      BinaryOperator::Opcode Op = SSE->getOpcode();
      assert(BinaryOperator::isComparisonOp(Op));

      // For now, we only support comparing pointers.
      assert(Loc::isLocType(SSE->getLHS()->getType()));
      assert(Loc::isLocType(SSE->getRHS()->getType()));
      QualType DiffTy = SymMgr.getContext().getPointerDiffType();
      SymbolRef Subtraction =
          SymMgr.getSymSymExpr(SSE->getRHS(), BO_Sub, SSE->getLHS(), DiffTy);

      const llvm::APSInt &Zero = getBasicVals().getValue(0, DiffTy);
      Op = BinaryOperator::reverseComparisonOp(Op);
      if (!Assumption)
        Op = BinaryOperator::negateComparisonOp(Op);
      return assumeSymRel(State, Subtraction, Op, Zero);
    }

    // If we get here, there's nothing else we can do but treat the symbol as
    // opaque.
    return assumeAuxForSymbol(State, Sym, Assumption);
  }

  case nonloc::ConcreteIntKind: {
    bool b = Cond.castAs<nonloc::ConcreteInt>().getValue() != 0;
    bool isFeasible = b ? Assumption : !Assumption;
    return isFeasible ? State : nullptr;
  }

  case nonloc::PointerToMemberKind: {
    bool IsNull = !Cond.castAs<nonloc::PointerToMember>().isNullMemberPointer();
    bool IsFeasible = IsNull ? Assumption : !Assumption;
    return IsFeasible ? State : nullptr;
  }

  case nonloc::LocAsIntegerKind:
    return assume(State, Cond.castAs<nonloc::LocAsInteger>().getLoc(),
                  Assumption);
  } // end switch
}
ProgramStateRef SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux(ProgramStateRef state,
                                                  NonLoc Cond,
                                                  bool Assumption) {

  // We cannot reason about SymSymExprs, and can only reason about some
  // SymIntExprs.
  if (!canReasonAbout(Cond)) {
    // Just add the constraint to the expression without trying to simplify.
    SymbolRef sym = Cond.getAsSymExpr();
    return assumeAuxForSymbol(state, sym, Assumption);
  }

  BasicValueFactory &BasicVals = getBasicVals();

  switch (Cond.getSubKind()) {
  default:
    llvm_unreachable("'Assume' not implemented for this NonLoc");

  case nonloc::SymbolValKind: {
    nonloc::SymbolVal& SV = cast<nonloc::SymbolVal>(Cond);
    SymbolRef sym = SV.getSymbol();
    assert(sym);

    // Handle SymbolData.
    if (!SV.isExpression()) {
      return assumeAuxForSymbol(state, sym, Assumption);

    // Handle symbolic expression.
    } else {
      // We can only simplify expressions whose RHS is an integer.
      const SymIntExpr *SE = dyn_cast<SymIntExpr>(sym);
      if (!SE)
        return assumeAuxForSymbol(state, sym, Assumption);

      BinaryOperator::Opcode op = SE->getOpcode();
      // Implicitly compare non-comparison expressions to 0.
      if (!BinaryOperator::isComparisonOp(op)) {
        QualType T = SE->getType(BasicVals.getContext());
        const llvm::APSInt &zero = BasicVals.getValue(0, T);
        op = (Assumption ? BO_NE : BO_EQ);
        return assumeSymRel(state, SE, op, zero);
      }
      // From here on out, op is the real comparison we'll be testing.
      if (!Assumption)
        op = NegateComparison(op);

      return assumeSymRel(state, SE->getLHS(), op, SE->getRHS());
    }
  }

  case nonloc::ConcreteIntKind: {
    bool b = cast<nonloc::ConcreteInt>(Cond).getValue() != 0;
    bool isFeasible = b ? Assumption : !Assumption;
    return isFeasible ? state : NULL;
  }

  case nonloc::LocAsIntegerKind:
    return assumeAux(state, cast<nonloc::LocAsInteger>(Cond).getLoc(),
                     Assumption);
  } // end switch
}