示例#1
0
/**
 * srcu_readers_active - returns approximate number of readers.
 * @sp: which srcu_struct to count active readers (holding srcu_read_lock).
 *
 * Note that this is not an atomic primitive, and can therefore suffer
 * severe errors when invoked on an active srcu_struct.  That said, it
 * can be useful as an error check at cleanup time.
 */
static int srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
	return srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, 0) + srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, 1);
}
示例#2
0
/*
 * Helper function for synchronize_srcu() and synchronize_srcu_expedited().
 */
static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, void (*sync_func)(void))
{
	int idx;

	idx = sp->completed;
	mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);

	/*
	 * Check to see if someone else did the work for us while we were
	 * waiting to acquire the lock.  We need -two- advances of
	 * the counter, not just one.  If there was but one, we might have
	 * shown up -after- our helper's first synchronize_sched(), thus
	 * having failed to prevent CPU-reordering races with concurrent
	 * srcu_read_unlock()s on other CPUs (see comment below).  So we
	 * either (1) wait for two or (2) supply the second ourselves.
	 */

	if ((sp->completed - idx) >= 2) {
		mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
		return;
	}

	sync_func();  /* Force memory barrier on all CPUs. */

	/*
	 * The preceding synchronize_sched() ensures that any CPU that
	 * sees the new value of sp->completed will also see any preceding
	 * changes to data structures made by this CPU.  This prevents
	 * some other CPU from reordering the accesses in its SRCU
	 * read-side critical section to precede the corresponding
	 * srcu_read_lock() -- ensuring that such references will in
	 * fact be protected.
	 *
	 * So it is now safe to do the flip.
	 */

	idx = sp->completed & 0x1;
	sp->completed++;

	sync_func();  /* Force memory barrier on all CPUs. */

	/*
	 * At this point, because of the preceding synchronize_sched(),
	 * all srcu_read_lock() calls using the old counters have completed.
	 * Their corresponding critical sections might well be still
	 * executing, but the srcu_read_lock() primitives themselves
	 * will have finished executing.  We initially give readers
	 * an arbitrarily chosen 10 microseconds to get out of their
	 * SRCU read-side critical sections, then loop waiting 1/HZ
	 * seconds per iteration.  The 10-microsecond value has done
	 * very well in testing.
	 */

	if (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
		udelay(SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY);
	while (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
		schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);

	sync_func();  /* Force memory barrier on all CPUs. */

	/*
	 * The preceding synchronize_sched() forces all srcu_read_unlock()
	 * primitives that were executing concurrently with the preceding
	 * for_each_possible_cpu() loop to have completed by this point.
	 * More importantly, it also forces the corresponding SRCU read-side
	 * critical sections to have also completed, and the corresponding
	 * references to SRCU-protected data items to be dropped.
	 *
	 * Note:
	 *
	 *	Despite what you might think at first glance, the
	 *	preceding synchronize_sched() -must- be within the
	 *	critical section ended by the following mutex_unlock().
	 *	Otherwise, a task taking the early exit can race
	 *	with a srcu_read_unlock(), which might have executed
	 *	just before the preceding srcu_readers_active() check,
	 *	and whose CPU might have reordered the srcu_read_unlock()
	 *	with the preceding critical section.  In this case, there
	 *	is nothing preventing the synchronize_sched() task that is
	 *	taking the early exit from freeing a data structure that
	 *	is still being referenced (out of order) by the task
	 *	doing the srcu_read_unlock().
	 *
	 *	Alternatively, the comparison with "2" on the early exit
	 *	could be changed to "3", but this increases synchronize_srcu()
	 *	latency for bulk loads.  So the current code is preferred.
	 */

	mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
}
示例#3
0
文件: srcu.c 项目: 383530895/linux
/*
 * Return true if the number of pre-existing readers is determined to
 * be stably zero.  An example unstable zero can occur if the call
 * to srcu_readers_active_idx() misses an __srcu_read_lock() increment,
 * but due to task migration, sees the corresponding __srcu_read_unlock()
 * decrement.  This can happen because srcu_readers_active_idx() takes
 * time to sum the array, and might in fact be interrupted or preempted
 * partway through the summation.
 */
static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
{
	unsigned long seq;

	seq = srcu_readers_seq_idx(sp, idx);

	/*
	 * The following smp_mb() A pairs with the smp_mb() B located in
	 * __srcu_read_lock().  This pairing ensures that if an
	 * __srcu_read_lock() increments its counter after the summation
	 * in srcu_readers_active_idx(), then the corresponding SRCU read-side
	 * critical section will see any changes made prior to the start
	 * of the current SRCU grace period.
	 *
	 * Also, if the above call to srcu_readers_seq_idx() saw the
	 * increment of ->seq[], then the call to srcu_readers_active_idx()
	 * must see the increment of ->c[].
	 */
	smp_mb(); /* A */

	/*
	 * Note that srcu_readers_active_idx() can incorrectly return
	 * zero even though there is a pre-existing reader throughout.
	 * To see this, suppose that task A is in a very long SRCU
	 * read-side critical section that started on CPU 0, and that
	 * no other reader exists, so that the sum of the counters
	 * is equal to one.  Then suppose that task B starts executing
	 * srcu_readers_active_idx(), summing up to CPU 1, and then that
	 * task C starts reading on CPU 0, so that its increment is not
	 * summed, but finishes reading on CPU 2, so that its decrement
	 * -is- summed.  Then when task B completes its sum, it will
	 * incorrectly get zero, despite the fact that task A has been
	 * in its SRCU read-side critical section the whole time.
	 *
	 * We therefore do a validation step should srcu_readers_active_idx()
	 * return zero.
	 */
	if (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx) != 0)
		return false;

	/*
	 * The remainder of this function is the validation step.
	 * The following smp_mb() D pairs with the smp_mb() C in
	 * __srcu_read_unlock().  If the __srcu_read_unlock() was seen
	 * by srcu_readers_active_idx() above, then any destructive
	 * operation performed after the grace period will happen after
	 * the corresponding SRCU read-side critical section.
	 *
	 * Note that there can be at most NR_CPUS worth of readers using
	 * the old index, which is not enough to overflow even a 32-bit
	 * integer.  (Yes, this does mean that systems having more than
	 * a billion or so CPUs need to be 64-bit systems.)  Therefore,
	 * the sum of the ->seq[] counters cannot possibly overflow.
	 * Therefore, the only way that the return values of the two
	 * calls to srcu_readers_seq_idx() can be equal is if there were
	 * no increments of the corresponding rank of ->seq[] counts
	 * in the interim.  But the missed-increment scenario laid out
	 * above includes an increment of the ->seq[] counter by
	 * the corresponding __srcu_read_lock().  Therefore, if this
	 * scenario occurs, the return values from the two calls to
	 * srcu_readers_seq_idx() will differ, and thus the validation
	 * step below suffices.
	 */
	smp_mb(); /* D */

	return srcu_readers_seq_idx(sp, idx) == seq;
}