//============================================================
// Test Suite: timeSystemTest()
//============================================================
//
// Test will check the TimeSystem comparisons when using
// the comparison operators.
//
//============================================================
int timeSystemTest( void )
{
TestUtil testFramework( "CommonTime", "Differing TimeSystem == Operator", __FILE__, __LINE__ );
CommonTime GPS1; GPS1.set( 1000, 200, 0.2, TimeSystem(2) );
CommonTime GPS2; GPS2.set( 100, 200, 0.2, TimeSystem(2) );
CommonTime UTC1; UTC1.set( 1000, 200, 0.2, TimeSystem(5) );
CommonTime UNKNOWN; UNKNOWN.set( 1000, 200, 0.2, TimeSystem(0) );
CommonTime ANY; ANY.set( 1000, 200, 0.2, TimeSystem(1) );
//----------------------------------------
// ???
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.assert( !(GPS1 == GPS2), "Verify same Time System but different time inequality", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( GPS1.getTimeSystem() == GPS2.getTimeSystem(), "Verify same Time System equality", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// Differing TimeSystem != Operator
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "Differing TimeSystem != Operator" );
testFramework.assert( GPS1 != UTC1, "Verify different Time System but same time inequality", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( GPS1 != UNKNOWN, "Verify different Time System but same time inequality", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// ANY TimeSystem == Operator
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "ANY TimeSystem == Operator" );
testFramework.assert( GPS1 == ANY, "Verify TimeSystem=ANY does not matter in TimeSystem=GPS comparisons", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( UTC1 == ANY, "Verify TimeSystem=ANY does not matter in TimeSystem=UTC comparisons", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( UNKNOWN == ANY, "Verify TimeSystem=ANY does not matter in TimeSystem=UNKOWN comparisons", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// ANY TimeSystem < Operator
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "ANY TimeSystem < Operator" );
testFramework.assert( !(GPS2 == ANY) && (GPS2 < ANY), "Verify TimeSystem=ANY does not matter in other operator comparisons", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// setTimeSystem
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "setTimeSystem" );
UNKNOWN.setTimeSystem( TimeSystem(2) ); //Set the Unknown TimeSystem
testFramework.assert( UNKNOWN.getTimeSystem()==TimeSystem(2), "Ensure resetting a Time System changes it", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// The End!
//----------------------------------------
return testFramework.countFails();
}
// Test will check converting to/from CommonTime.
unsigned toFromCommonTimeTest()
{
TUDEF("IRNWeekSecond", "isValid");
IRNWeekSecond compare(0,10.0,TimeSystem::IRN); //Initialize an object
CommonTime truth;
long truthDay, truthSOD;
double truthFSOD;
truth.set(2451412, 43210,0.0,TimeSystem::IRN);
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
//Is the time after the BEGINNING_OF_TIME?
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
TUASSERT(compare.convertToCommonTime() > CommonTime::BEGINNING_OF_TIME);
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
//Is the set object valid?
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
TUASSERT(compare.isValid());
CommonTime test = compare.convertToCommonTime(); //Convert to CommonTime
long testDay, testSOD;
double testFSOD;
test.get(testDay, testSOD, testFSOD);
truth.get(truthDay, truthSOD, truthFSOD);
// Currently, IRNWeekSecond does not convert to proper CommonTime
// These tests will be valid and will be uncommented once issue_248 has been
// resolved and merged into master.
// TUASSERTE(long, truthDay, testDay);
// TUASSERTE(long, truthSOD, testSOD);
// TUASSERTFE(truthFSOD, testFSOD);
IRNWeekSecond test2;
test2.convertFromCommonTime(test); //Convert From
testFramework.changeSourceMethod("CommonTimeConversion");
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
//Is the result of conversion the same?
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
TUASSERTE(TimeSystem, compare.getTimeSystem(), test2.getTimeSystem());
TUASSERTE(int, compare.week, test2.week);
TUASSERTFE(compare.sow, test2.sow);
//TUASSERT(test2 == test);
TURETURN();
}
//============================================================
// Test Suite: resetTest()
//============================================================
//
// Test will check the reset method.
//
//============================================================
int resetTest( void )
{
TestUtil testFramework( "CommonTime", "reset" , __FILE__, __LINE__ );
CommonTime Compare; Compare.set(1000,200,0.2); // Initialize with value
long day, sod;
double fsod;
Compare.reset(); // Reset it
Compare.get(day,sod,fsod);
testFramework.assert( TimeSystem(0) == Compare.getTimeSystem(), "Was the time system reset to expectation?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( 0 == day, "Was the day value reset to expectation?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( 0 == sod, "Was the sod value reset to expectation?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( 0 == fsod, "Was the fsod value reset to expectation?", __LINE__ );
return testFramework.countFails();
}
CommonTime JulianDate::convertToCommonTime() const
{
try
{
long double temp_jd( jd + 0.5 );
long jday( static_cast<long>( temp_jd ) );
long double sod =
( temp_jd - static_cast<long double>( jday ) ) * SEC_PER_DAY;
CommonTime ct;
return ct.set( jday,
static_cast<long>( sod ),
static_cast<double>( sod - static_cast<long>( sod ) ),
timeSystem );
}
catch (InvalidParameter& ip)
{
InvalidRequest ir(ip);
GPSTK_THROW(ir);
}
}
CommonTime WeekSecond::convertToCommonTime() const
{
try
{
//int dow = static_cast<int>( sow * DAY_PER_SEC );
// Appears to have rounding issues on 32-bit platforms
int dow = static_cast<int>( sow / SEC_PER_DAY );
// NB this assumes MJDEpoch is an integer - what if epoch H:M:S != 0:0:0 ?
long jday = MJD_JDAY + MJDEpoch() + (7 * week) + dow;
double sod(sow - SEC_PER_DAY * dow);
CommonTime ct;
return ct.set( jday,
static_cast<long>(sod),
sod - static_cast<long>(sod),
timeSystem );
}
catch (InvalidParameter& ip)
{
GPSTK_RETHROW(ip);
}
}
//============================================================
// Test Suite: rolloverTest()
//============================================================
//
// Test to check arithmetic operations function properly when
// rolling over or under the three time variables
//
//============================================================
int rolloverTest( void )
{
TestUtil testFramework( "CommonTime", "addSeconds", __FILE__, __LINE__ );
CommonTime fsodRollover; fsodRollover.set(10 , 6789 , 0.000999);
CommonTime msodRollover; msodRollover.set(10 , 86399, 0.0001 );
CommonTime dayRollunder; dayRollunder.set(10 , 2 , 0.0001 );
CommonTime msodRollunder; msodRollunder.set(10 , 10 , 0.000001);
CommonTime expectedfsodROver; expectedfsodROver.set(10, 6789 , 0.001000);
CommonTime expectedmsodROver; expectedmsodROver.set(11, 0 , 0.0001);
CommonTime expectedDayRUnder; expectedDayRUnder.set( 9, 86399, 0.0001);
CommonTime expectedmsodRUnder; expectedmsodRUnder.set(10, 9 , 0.999999);
long obtainedDay, expectedDay;
long obtainedMsod, expectedMsod;
double obtainedFsod, expectedFsod;
double diff;
long incrementSecLong = 1L , decrementSecLong = -3L;
double incrementSecDouble = 0.000001, decrementSecDouble = -0.000002;
//--------------------------------
//Rollover Tests
//--------------------------------
//fsod Rollover test
fsodRollover.addSeconds(incrementSecDouble);
fsodRollover.get(obtainedDay,obtainedMsod,obtainedFsod);
expectedfsodROver.get(expectedDay,expectedMsod,expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(obtainedDay == expectedDay , "Rollover of fsod affected day value" , __LINE__);
testFramework.assert(obtainedMsod == expectedMsod, "Rollover of fsod did not change msod", __LINE__);
diff = fabs(obtainedFsod - expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(diff < eps, "fsod did not rollover properly" , __LINE__);
//msod Rollover test
msodRollover.addSeconds(incrementSecLong);
msodRollover.get(obtainedDay,obtainedMsod,obtainedFsod);
expectedmsodROver.get(expectedDay,expectedMsod,expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(obtainedDay == expectedDay , "Rollover of msod did not change day" , __LINE__);
testFramework.assert(obtainedMsod == expectedMsod, "msod did not rollover properly" , __LINE__);
diff = fabs(obtainedFsod - expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(diff < eps, "Rollover of msod affected fsod oddly", __LINE__);
//--------------------------------
//Rollunder Tests
//--------------------------------
//fsod Rollover test
dayRollunder.addSeconds(decrementSecLong);
dayRollunder.get(obtainedDay,obtainedMsod,obtainedFsod);
expectedDayRUnder.get(expectedDay,expectedMsod,expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(obtainedDay == expectedDay , "Rollunder of msod did not change day" , __LINE__);
testFramework.assert(obtainedMsod == expectedMsod, "msod did not rollunder properly" , __LINE__);
diff = fabs(obtainedFsod - expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(diff < eps, "Rollunder of msod affected fsod oddly", __LINE__);
//msod Rollover test
msodRollunder.addSeconds(decrementSecDouble);
msodRollunder.get(obtainedDay,obtainedMsod,obtainedFsod);
expectedmsodRUnder.get(expectedDay,expectedMsod,expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(obtainedDay == expectedDay , "Rollunder of fsod affected day value" , __LINE__);
testFramework.assert(obtainedMsod == expectedMsod, "Rollunder of fsod did not change msod", __LINE__);
diff = fabs(obtainedFsod - expectedFsod);
testFramework.assert(diff < eps, "fsod did not rollunder properly" , __LINE__);
return testFramework.countFails();
}
//============================================================
// Test Suite: operatorTest()
//============================================================
//
// Test the comparison operators
//
//============================================================
int operatorTest( void )
{
TestUtil testFramework( "CommonTime", "Differing TimeSystem, Operator ==", __FILE__, __LINE__ );
CommonTime Compare; Compare.set(1000,200,0.2); // Initialize with value
CommonTime LessThanDay; LessThanDay.set(100,200,0.2); // Initialize with smaller day value
CommonTime LessThanSecond; LessThanSecond.set(1000,20,0.2); // Initialize with smaller second value
CommonTime LessThanFSecond; LessThanFSecond.set(1000,200,0.1); // Initialize with smaller fractional second value
CommonTime CompareCopy(Compare); // Initialize with copy constructor
testFramework.assert( Compare == CompareCopy, "GPSWeekZCount operator ==, Are equivalent objects equivalent?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare == LessThanDay), "GPSWeekZCount operator !=, Are non-equivalent objects equivalent?", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// Operator !=
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "Operator !=" );
testFramework.assert( Compare != LessThanDay, "GPSWeekZCount operator !=, Are non-equivalent objects not equivalent?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare != LessThanSecond, "GPSWeekZCount operator !=, Are non-equivalent objects not equivalent?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare != LessThanFSecond, "GPSWeekZCount operator !=, Are non-equivalent objects not equivalent?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare != Compare), "GPSWeekZCount operator !=, Are equivalent objects not equivalent?", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// Operator <
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "Operator <" );
testFramework.assert( LessThanDay < Compare, "Does the < operator function when left_object < right_object?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( LessThanSecond < Compare, "Does the < operator function when left_object < right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare < LessThanSecond), "Does the < operator function when left_object > right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( LessThanFSecond < Compare, "Does the < operator function when left_object < right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare < LessThanFSecond), "Does the < operator function when left_object > right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare < CompareCopy), "Does the < operator function when left_object = right_object?", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// Greater than assertions
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "Operator >" );
testFramework.assert( Compare > LessThanDay, "Does the > operator function when left_object > right_object by years?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(LessThanDay > Compare), "Does the > operator function when left_object < right_object by years?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare > LessThanSecond, "Does the > operator function when left_object > right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(LessThanSecond > Compare), "Does the > operator function when left_object < right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare > LessThanFSecond, "Does the > operator function when left_object > right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(LessThanFSecond > Compare), "Does the > operator function when left_object < right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare > CompareCopy), "Does the > operator function when left_object = right_object?", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// Less than equals assertion
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "Operator <=" );
testFramework.assert( LessThanDay <= Compare, "Does the < operator function when left_object < right_object by years?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare <= LessThanDay), "Does the <= operator function when left_object > right_object by years?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( LessThanSecond <= Compare, "Does the <= operator function when left_object < right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare <= LessThanSecond), "Does the <= operator function when left_object > right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( LessThanFSecond <= Compare, "Does the <= operator function when left_object < right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(Compare <= LessThanFSecond), "Does the <= operator function when left_object > right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare <= CompareCopy, "Does the <= operator function when left_object = right_object?", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// Greater than equals assertion
//----------------------------------------
testFramework.changeSourceMethod( "Operator >=" );
testFramework.assert( Compare >= LessThanDay, "Does the >= operator function when left_object > right_object by years?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(LessThanDay >= Compare), "Does the >= operator function when left_object < right_object by years?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare >= LessThanSecond, "Does the >= operator function when left_object > right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(LessThanSecond >= Compare), "Does the >= operator function when left_object < right_object by days?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( Compare >= LessThanFSecond, "Does the >= operator function when left_object > right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
testFramework.assert( !(LessThanFSecond >= Compare), "Does the >= operator function when left_object < right_object by seconds?", __LINE__ );
// typo from last guy??
testFramework.assert( !(Compare < CompareCopy), "Does the > operator function when left_object = right_object?", __LINE__ );
//----------------------------------------
// The End!
//----------------------------------------
return testFramework.countFails();
}
//============================================================
// Test Suite: improperSetTest()
//============================================================
//
// Test to see if setting improper values induces the
// correct exception handling.
//============================================================
int improperSetTest( void )
{
CommonTime Test;
Test.set (700000, 0, 0.);
TestUtil testFramework( "CommonTime", "set", __FILE__, __LINE__ );
// Break the input in various ways and make sure the proper exception is called
//----------------------------------------
// Does CommonTime.set() work with negative days?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.set(-1,0,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with negative day, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
// QUESTION: Why test for gpstk::InvalidRequest exception instead of gpstk::Exception?
// ANSWER: gpstk::InvalidRequest is a child of gpstk::Exception, and depending on CommonTime.cpp
// we might sometimes need to be more specific than catching gpstk::Exception
// catch( gpstk::InvalidParameter e)
// For now, I'm replacing gpstk::InvalidParameter with gpstk::Exception to be consistent throughout this test application
catch( gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with negative day should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with negative day, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does CommonTime.set() work with too many days?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.set(3442449,0,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with too many days, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with too many days should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with too many days, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does CommonTime.set() work with negative seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.set(700000,-1,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with negative seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with negative seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "Fail", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does a set method work with too many seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.set(700000,24*60*60+1,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with too many seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with too many seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with too many seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does a set method work with negative fractional seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.set(700000,0,-1.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with negative fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with negative fractional seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with negative fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does a set method work with too many fractional seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.set(700000,0,2.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with too many fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch( gpstk::Exception e )
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with too many fractional seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.set() with too many fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does CommonTime.setInterval() work with negative days?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.setInternal(-1,0,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative days, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch( gpstk::Exception e )
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.set() with negative days should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative days, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does CommonTime.setInterval() work with too many days?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.setInternal(3442449,0,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many days, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many days should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many days, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does CommonTime.setInterval() work with negative seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.setInternal(700000,-1,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does a set method work with too many seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.setInternal(700000,24*60*60+1,0.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
// catch(...)
// {
// testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
// }
//----------------------------------------
// Does a set method work with negative fractional seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.setInternal(700000,1001,-1.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative fractional seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch (...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with negative fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// Does a set method work with too many fractional seconds?
//----------------------------------------
try
{
Test.setInternal(700000,1001,1001.);
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw no exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(gpstk::Exception e)
{
testFramework.assert( true, "[expected] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many fractional seconds should throw a gpstk::Exception", __LINE__ );
}
catch(...)
{
testFramework.assert( false, "[testing] CommonTime.setInterval() with too many fractional seconds, [expected] exception gpstk::Exception, [actual] threw wrong exception", __LINE__ );
}
//----------------------------------------
// The End!
//----------------------------------------
return testFramework.countFails();
}
