std::string
IntegerOverflowChecker::getSymbolInformation(const SVal &Val, const Expr *E,
                                             CheckerContext &C) const {
  ProgramStateRef State = C.getState();
  std::string StreamRangeStr, SValDumpStr;
  llvm::raw_string_ostream StreamRange(StreamRangeStr), SValDump(SValDumpStr);
  Val.dumpToStream(SValDump);
  if (Val.getSubKind() == SymbolValKind) {
    State->getConstraintManager().print(State, StreamRange, "\n", "\n");
    StreamRange.flush();
    size_t from = StreamRangeStr.find(SValDump.str() + " : ");
    if (from != std::string::npos) {
      size_t to = StreamRangeStr.find("\n", from);
      from += SValDump.str().length();
      SValDump.str().append(StreamRangeStr.substr(from, to - from));
    }
  }
  if (!E || isa<IntegerLiteral>(E->IgnoreParenCasts()))
    return SValDump.str();

  E = E->IgnoreParens();
  if (const UnaryOperator *UO = dyn_cast<UnaryOperator>(E))
    if ((UO->getOpcode() == UO_Plus || UO->getOpcode() == UO_Minus) &&
        isa<IntegerLiteral>(UO->getSubExpr()))
      return SValDump.str();

  SValDump << " (";
  E->printPretty(SValDump, 0, C.getASTContext().getPrintingPolicy());
  SValDump << ")";

  return SValDump.str();
}
static bool isLeaked(SymbolRef Sym, const StreamState &SS,
                     bool IsSymDead, ProgramStateRef State) {
  if (IsSymDead && SS.isOpened()) {
    // If a symbol is NULL, assume that fopen failed on this path.
    // A symbol should only be considered leaked if it is non-null.
    ConstraintManager &CMgr = State->getConstraintManager();
    ConditionTruthVal OpenFailed = CMgr.isNull(State, Sym);
    return !OpenFailed.isConstrainedTrue();
  }
  return false;
}
示例#3
0
void MacOSKeychainAPIChecker::checkDeadSymbols(SymbolReaper &SR,
                                               CheckerContext &C) const {
  ProgramStateRef State = C.getState();
  AllocatedDataTy ASet = State->get<AllocatedData>();
  if (ASet.isEmpty())
    return;

  bool Changed = false;
  AllocationPairVec Errors;
  for (AllocatedDataTy::iterator I = ASet.begin(), E = ASet.end(); I != E; ++I) {
    if (SR.isLive(I->first))
      continue;

    Changed = true;
    State = State->remove<AllocatedData>(I->first);
    // If the allocated symbol is null or if the allocation call might have
    // returned an error, do not report.
    ConstraintManager &CMgr = State->getConstraintManager();
    ConditionTruthVal AllocFailed = CMgr.isNull(State, I.getKey());
    if (AllocFailed.isConstrainedTrue() ||
        definitelyReturnedError(I->second.Region, State, C.getSValBuilder()))
      continue;
    Errors.push_back(std::make_pair(I->first, &I->second));
  }
  if (!Changed) {
    // Generate the new, cleaned up state.
    C.addTransition(State);
    return;
  }

  static SimpleProgramPointTag Tag("MacOSKeychainAPIChecker : DeadSymbolsLeak");
  ExplodedNode *N = C.addTransition(C.getState(), C.getPredecessor(), &Tag);

  // Generate the error reports.
  for (AllocationPairVec::iterator I = Errors.begin(), E = Errors.end();
                                                       I != E; ++I) {
    C.emitReport(generateAllocatedDataNotReleasedReport(*I, N, C));
  }

  // Generate the new, cleaned up state.
  C.addTransition(State, N);
}
// In PthreadSemantics, pthread_mutex_destroy() returns zero if the lock is
// successfully destroyed and it returns a non-zero value otherwise.
ProgramStateRef PthreadLockChecker::resolvePossiblyDestroyedMutex(
    ProgramStateRef state, const MemRegion *lockR, const SymbolRef *sym) const {
  const LockState *lstate = state->get<LockMap>(lockR);
  // Existence in DestroyRetVal ensures existence in LockMap.
  // Existence in Destroyed also ensures that the lock state for lockR is either
  // UntouchedAndPossiblyDestroyed or UnlockedAndPossiblyDestroyed.
  assert(lstate->isUntouchedAndPossiblyDestroyed() ||
         lstate->isUnlockedAndPossiblyDestroyed());

  ConstraintManager &CMgr = state->getConstraintManager();
  ConditionTruthVal retZero = CMgr.isNull(state, *sym);
  if (retZero.isConstrainedFalse()) {
    if (lstate->isUntouchedAndPossiblyDestroyed())
      state = state->remove<LockMap>(lockR);
    else if (lstate->isUnlockedAndPossiblyDestroyed())
      state = state->set<LockMap>(lockR, LockState::getUnlocked());
  } else
    state = state->set<LockMap>(lockR, LockState::getDestroyed());

  // Removing the map entry (lockR, sym) from DestroyRetVal as the lock state is
  // now resolved.
  state = state->remove<DestroyRetVal>(lockR);
  return state;
}
示例#5
0
SVal SimpleSValBuilder::evalBinOpNN(ProgramStateRef state,
                                  BinaryOperator::Opcode op,
                                  NonLoc lhs, NonLoc rhs,
                                  QualType resultTy)  {
  NonLoc InputLHS = lhs;
  NonLoc InputRHS = rhs;

  // Handle trivial case where left-side and right-side are the same.
  if (lhs == rhs)
    switch (op) {
      default:
        break;
      case BO_EQ:
      case BO_LE:
      case BO_GE:
        return makeTruthVal(true, resultTy);
      case BO_LT:
      case BO_GT:
      case BO_NE:
        return makeTruthVal(false, resultTy);
      case BO_Xor:
      case BO_Sub:
        if (resultTy->isIntegralOrEnumerationType())
          return makeIntVal(0, resultTy);
        return evalCastFromNonLoc(makeIntVal(0, /*Unsigned=*/false), resultTy);
      case BO_Or:
      case BO_And:
        return evalCastFromNonLoc(lhs, resultTy);
    }

  while (1) {
    switch (lhs.getSubKind()) {
    default:
      return makeSymExprValNN(state, op, lhs, rhs, resultTy);
    case nonloc::PointerToMemberKind: {
      assert(rhs.getSubKind() == nonloc::PointerToMemberKind &&
             "Both SVals should have pointer-to-member-type");
      auto LPTM = lhs.castAs<nonloc::PointerToMember>(),
           RPTM = rhs.castAs<nonloc::PointerToMember>();
      auto LPTMD = LPTM.getPTMData(), RPTMD = RPTM.getPTMData();
      switch (op) {
        case BO_EQ:
          return makeTruthVal(LPTMD == RPTMD, resultTy);
        case BO_NE:
          return makeTruthVal(LPTMD != RPTMD, resultTy);
        default:
          return UnknownVal();
      }
    }
    case nonloc::LocAsIntegerKind: {
      Loc lhsL = lhs.castAs<nonloc::LocAsInteger>().getLoc();
      switch (rhs.getSubKind()) {
        case nonloc::LocAsIntegerKind:
          return evalBinOpLL(state, op, lhsL,
                             rhs.castAs<nonloc::LocAsInteger>().getLoc(),
                             resultTy);
        case nonloc::ConcreteIntKind: {
          // Transform the integer into a location and compare.
          // FIXME: This only makes sense for comparisons. If we want to, say,
          // add 1 to a LocAsInteger, we'd better unpack the Loc and add to it,
          // then pack it back into a LocAsInteger.
          llvm::APSInt i = rhs.castAs<nonloc::ConcreteInt>().getValue();
          BasicVals.getAPSIntType(Context.VoidPtrTy).apply(i);
          return evalBinOpLL(state, op, lhsL, makeLoc(i), resultTy);
        }
        default:
          switch (op) {
            case BO_EQ:
              return makeTruthVal(false, resultTy);
            case BO_NE:
              return makeTruthVal(true, resultTy);
            default:
              // This case also handles pointer arithmetic.
              return makeSymExprValNN(state, op, InputLHS, InputRHS, resultTy);
          }
      }
    }
    case nonloc::ConcreteIntKind: {
      llvm::APSInt LHSValue = lhs.castAs<nonloc::ConcreteInt>().getValue();

      // If we're dealing with two known constants, just perform the operation.
      if (const llvm::APSInt *KnownRHSValue = getKnownValue(state, rhs)) {
        llvm::APSInt RHSValue = *KnownRHSValue;
        if (BinaryOperator::isComparisonOp(op)) {
          // We're looking for a type big enough to compare the two values.
          // FIXME: This is not correct. char + short will result in a promotion
          // to int. Unfortunately we have lost types by this point.
          APSIntType CompareType = std::max(APSIntType(LHSValue),
                                            APSIntType(RHSValue));
          CompareType.apply(LHSValue);
          CompareType.apply(RHSValue);
        } else if (!BinaryOperator::isShiftOp(op)) {
          APSIntType IntType = BasicVals.getAPSIntType(resultTy);
          IntType.apply(LHSValue);
          IntType.apply(RHSValue);
        }

        const llvm::APSInt *Result =
          BasicVals.evalAPSInt(op, LHSValue, RHSValue);
        if (!Result)
          return UndefinedVal();

        return nonloc::ConcreteInt(*Result);
      }

      // Swap the left and right sides and flip the operator if doing so
      // allows us to better reason about the expression (this is a form
      // of expression canonicalization).
      // While we're at it, catch some special cases for non-commutative ops.
      switch (op) {
      case BO_LT:
      case BO_GT:
      case BO_LE:
      case BO_GE:
        op = BinaryOperator::reverseComparisonOp(op);
        // FALL-THROUGH
      case BO_EQ:
      case BO_NE:
      case BO_Add:
      case BO_Mul:
      case BO_And:
      case BO_Xor:
      case BO_Or:
        std::swap(lhs, rhs);
        continue;
      case BO_Shr:
        // (~0)>>a
        if (LHSValue.isAllOnesValue() && LHSValue.isSigned())
          return evalCastFromNonLoc(lhs, resultTy);
        // FALL-THROUGH
      case BO_Shl:
        // 0<<a and 0>>a
        if (LHSValue == 0)
          return evalCastFromNonLoc(lhs, resultTy);
        return makeSymExprValNN(state, op, InputLHS, InputRHS, resultTy);
      default:
        return makeSymExprValNN(state, op, InputLHS, InputRHS, resultTy);
      }
    }
    case nonloc::SymbolValKind: {
      // We only handle LHS as simple symbols or SymIntExprs.
      SymbolRef Sym = lhs.castAs<nonloc::SymbolVal>().getSymbol();

      // LHS is a symbolic expression.
      if (const SymIntExpr *symIntExpr = dyn_cast<SymIntExpr>(Sym)) {

        // Is this a logical not? (!x is represented as x == 0.)
        if (op == BO_EQ && rhs.isZeroConstant()) {
          // We know how to negate certain expressions. Simplify them here.

          BinaryOperator::Opcode opc = symIntExpr->getOpcode();
          switch (opc) {
          default:
            // We don't know how to negate this operation.
            // Just handle it as if it were a normal comparison to 0.
            break;
          case BO_LAnd:
          case BO_LOr:
            llvm_unreachable("Logical operators handled by branching logic.");
          case BO_Assign:
          case BO_MulAssign:
          case BO_DivAssign:
          case BO_RemAssign:
          case BO_AddAssign:
          case BO_SubAssign:
          case BO_ShlAssign:
          case BO_ShrAssign:
          case BO_AndAssign:
          case BO_XorAssign:
          case BO_OrAssign:
          case BO_Comma:
            llvm_unreachable("'=' and ',' operators handled by ExprEngine.");
          case BO_PtrMemD:
          case BO_PtrMemI:
            llvm_unreachable("Pointer arithmetic not handled here.");
          case BO_LT:
          case BO_GT:
          case BO_LE:
          case BO_GE:
          case BO_EQ:
          case BO_NE:
            assert(resultTy->isBooleanType() ||
                   resultTy == getConditionType());
            assert(symIntExpr->getType()->isBooleanType() ||
                   getContext().hasSameUnqualifiedType(symIntExpr->getType(),
                                                       getConditionType()));
            // Negate the comparison and make a value.
            opc = BinaryOperator::negateComparisonOp(opc);
            return makeNonLoc(symIntExpr->getLHS(), opc,
                symIntExpr->getRHS(), resultTy);
          }
        }

        // For now, only handle expressions whose RHS is a constant.
        if (const llvm::APSInt *RHSValue = getKnownValue(state, rhs)) {
          // If both the LHS and the current expression are additive,
          // fold their constants and try again.
          if (BinaryOperator::isAdditiveOp(op)) {
            BinaryOperator::Opcode lop = symIntExpr->getOpcode();
            if (BinaryOperator::isAdditiveOp(lop)) {
              // Convert the two constants to a common type, then combine them.

              // resultTy may not be the best type to convert to, but it's
              // probably the best choice in expressions with mixed type
              // (such as x+1U+2LL). The rules for implicit conversions should
              // choose a reasonable type to preserve the expression, and will
              // at least match how the value is going to be used.
              APSIntType IntType = BasicVals.getAPSIntType(resultTy);
              const llvm::APSInt &first = IntType.convert(symIntExpr->getRHS());
              const llvm::APSInt &second = IntType.convert(*RHSValue);

              const llvm::APSInt *newRHS;
              if (lop == op)
                newRHS = BasicVals.evalAPSInt(BO_Add, first, second);
              else
                newRHS = BasicVals.evalAPSInt(BO_Sub, first, second);

              assert(newRHS && "Invalid operation despite common type!");
              rhs = nonloc::ConcreteInt(*newRHS);
              lhs = nonloc::SymbolVal(symIntExpr->getLHS());
              op = lop;
              continue;
            }
          }

          // Otherwise, make a SymIntExpr out of the expression.
          return MakeSymIntVal(symIntExpr, op, *RHSValue, resultTy);
        }
      }

      // Does the symbolic expression simplify to a constant?
      // If so, "fold" the constant by setting 'lhs' to a ConcreteInt
      // and try again.
      ConstraintManager &CMgr = state->getConstraintManager();
      if (const llvm::APSInt *Constant = CMgr.getSymVal(state, Sym)) {
        lhs = nonloc::ConcreteInt(*Constant);
        continue;
      }

      // Is the RHS a constant?
      if (const llvm::APSInt *RHSValue = getKnownValue(state, rhs))
        return MakeSymIntVal(Sym, op, *RHSValue, resultTy);

      // Give up -- this is not a symbolic expression we can handle.
      return makeSymExprValNN(state, op, InputLHS, InputRHS, resultTy);
    }
    }
  }
}